Communication from Malaysia concerning answers given by the United Nationsto the questions put by Judges Guillaume and Koroma

DIFFERENCE RELATING TO IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCESS
OF A SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR Of THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS: COMMENTS BY THEGQVERNMENT QE MALAYSIA ON

THE ANSWERS ON BEHALE OF THE SECRETABY-GENERAL OF
THE UNIIEb NATIONS TO THE QUESTIONS ASKED B'( JUQGEii
GUILLAUME AND KAROMA

1. Wi1h respectto the answer to the Question askby Judge

Guillaume;

1. The Government of Malaysia obsèrves that in the summary

Reply of the United Kingdom to questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

22-DEC-2009 15: 46 FROM LEGAL ADlJISERS
TO 90031703649928 P.03

UNITED KINGDOM'S RESPONSE TO THE QUESTIONS PUT BY

JUDGES KOROMAANDCANÇADOTRJ.NDADE

1. Judge Koroma put the folJowing question to the participants at the end of
the oral proceedings:

Written answer of Malta to the question posed by Judge Oda at the hearing held on 30 January 1984

CORRESPONDENCE 503

66, THE REGISTRAR TO THE AGENT OF THE UBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA

27 January 1984.

I have the honour toacknowledge receipt of the letter dated 23 January 1984
in which you give your views on the accessibility to the public of the written
observations of the Parties on Italy's Application for permission to intervene in
the case conceming the Continental Shelf (Lihyan Arah Jamahiriya/Ma/ta).

Reply of the French Republic to the questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings (translation)

Reply of the French Republic to questions posed by Judges Koroma
and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

[Translation]

Reply of the French Republic to the question

posed by Judge Cançado Trindade

1. Judge Cançado Trindade’s qu estion relates to two sets of problems, one of which, for the

Comments of the Kingdom of Cambodia on the reply provided by the Kingdom of Thailand to the question put to the Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade (translation)

Letter to the Registrar dated 13 June 2011 from

the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find below some comments on the reply provided by Thailand to the question put by
Judge Cançado Trindade.

Firstly, Cambodia notes that Thailand gives very little information on the area of the Temple

Reply of the United States of America to questions posed by Judges Koroma
and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

Question put by Judge Koroma

It has been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a territory
from a sovereign State. Could participants in these proceedings address the Court on the
principles and rules of international law, if any, which, outside the colonial context, permit the

secession of a territory from a sovereign State without the latter' s consent?

Answer of the United States of America

Links