Response of Belgium to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting of 8 April 2009 (translation)

BELGIUM S RESPONSE TO J UDGE C ANÇADO T RINDADE

1. The questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade may be set out as follows:

1. For the purposes of a proper understanding of the rights to be preserved (under Article41 of
the Statute of the Court), are there rights corresponding to the obligations set forth in Article 7,
paragraph1, in combination with Article5, paragraph2, of the 1984 United Nations

Convention Against Torture?”

2. “[. . .] if so, what are their legal nature, content and effects?”

Comments of Iran on the Replies of the United States to the questions put by Judges Al-Khasawneh and Rigaux

CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS

(Islamic Republic oflran v. United States of America)

COMMENTS OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN ON THE REPLIES
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE QUESTIONS PUT
BY JUDGE AL-KHASA WNEH AND JUDGE AD HOC RIGAUX

FIRST QUESTION OF JUDGE AL-KHASA WNEH TO THE UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA:

"ln the opinion of counsel of the United States, arc the concepts of lex specialis, on the
one band, and self-contained régimes, on the other, synonymous? If not, what are the

The Russian Federation's comments on Georgia's written response to the questions put by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON TE-ffi
ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(GEORGIA v.RUSSIAN FEDERATION)

COMMENTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
ON THE WRITTEN REPLIES OF GEORGIA TO THE QUESTIONS

PUTTO THE PARTIES DURING THE ORAL HEARING
BY JUDGES KOROMA AND CANÇADO TRINDADE

1 October 2010

Response of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the questions of Judge Rigaux addressed to both parties

Annex 1toOP 2003/30

CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS
(Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America)

RESPONSE TO THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN TO THE QUESTIONS OF

JUDGE RIGAUX ADDRESSED TO BOTH PARTIES

FIRST QUESTION:

"What is the legal status of oil platforms constructed by a State on its continental shelf?

Written answers of the United Kingdom to the question posed by Judge Petrén on 29 March 1974

CORRESPONDENCE 475

2. The Exchange of Notes of 13 November 1973 between Jceland and the
United Kîn~gdom, the Arrangement relating to fisheries in waters surrounding
the Faroe Islands of 18 Deccntber 1973 and the Agreement of 15 March 1974
between Norway, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United

Kingdom on the Regulation of the Fishing of North East Arctic (Arcto­
Norwegian) Cod have been registered with the Secretariat of the United
Nations.

Letter from the Agent of Serbia and Montenegro transmitting to the Court his Government's answers to the questions put by the Vice-President

• 1

RESPONSE OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO TO THE QUESTIONS POSED BY

THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT ON 9 MAY 2006

1.

On 9 May 2006, the Vice-President of the Court posed the following question to both parties:

"In 1996 the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia concluded two bilateral agreements

with Croatia and Macedonia, respectively, and its President made a joint declaration

Answers given by the United Nations to the questions put by Judges Guillaume and Koroma

Question by Judge Guillaume

"Je serais reconnaissant au représentant des Nations Unies de fournir toute information
en sa possession sur les travaux préparatoires de la décision1998/297 par laquelle le Conseil
économique et social a saisi la Cour." [CR 98/17, p.53J

Answer

1. The Economie and Social Council formally considered the Note by the Secretary-General

Subscribe to
Links