[Translation]

Reply of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
to the question of President SCHWEBEL

1.Libya's case, such as it was argued during the hearing on Wednesday 22 October 1997, is that there
has been an abuse or misuse of power if the Security Council has determined that there exists a
threat to the peace as the basis for requiring Liba to surrender the accused to the United States
or to the United Kingdom.

Legality of the Use by a.State of !"uclear Weapons in Armed Conjlict

Legality of the Threat or Use ofNuclear Weapons

Licéitée l'utilisation des armes nucléairespar un Etat diJnsun conflit armé

Licéitéde la menace oul'emploi d'armes nucléaires

WRITTEN REPLIES TO QUESTIONS PUT BY

MEMBERS OF THE COURT

RÉPONSES ÉCRITES AUX QUESTIONS POSÉES PAR

LES MEMBRES DE LA COURWHO Response of the World Health Organization

Question of Vice-President Schwebel

In these proceedings, both Parties cite documents from the
ratification processes of treaties of friendship, commerce and

navigation to shed light on their intentions in concluding the
1955 Treaty of Amity, Economie Relations and Consular Rights in
the terms in which it was concluded.

INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE

ACCORDANCEWITHINTERNATIONALLAWOF
THE UNILATERALDECLARATIONOFINDEPENDENCEBYTHE
PROVISIONALINSTITUTIONSOFSELF-GOVERNMENTOFKOSOVO
(REQUESTFORANADVISORYOPINION)

ANSWEROFTHE REPUBLICOFSERBIATOTHE QUESTIONSPUTTO

THEPARTICIPANTSIN THEORALPROCEEDINGSBYJUDGESKOROMA,

BENNOUNAANDCANÇADOTRINDADE

1. QUESTIONPUTBYJUDGEKOROMA

The question:

"Ithas been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a

384 BORDERANDTRANSBORDERARMEDACTIONS

rcply gitcn Ii? Your E~cel1r.n~~ai the sanie sittii(<,<pro p. 141) cvcn ihoush
iiw:i~thcn dcscribcd as "3 parii:ll answer". andiiu,a,furihcr stated ai ihe<II-
ting i~i14Junr. 1988that ihc question< put w<~ulrh lc :lnsu,crcd in writing

104. THE AGENT OF HONDURAS TO THE REGISTRAR

The Hague, 19July 1988.

INTERNATIONCOURTOFJUSTICE

CASECONCERNINAGRMED
ACTIVITIES

ONTHETERRITORY
OFTHECONGO

DEMOCR TICREPUBLIOFTHECONGO
v.

UGANDA

UGANDA'OBSERVATIONOSNTHEDRC'SRESPONSESOJUDGESQ' UESTIONS
13MAY20051. Uganda's Observations on the DRC's Response to the Question of Judge Vereshchetin

NO .32 P. 2

QUESTIONSFROMTHECOURT-WRITTEN REPLYBVTHEREPUBLJC OFCYPRUS

1. "lt has been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a
territory from a sovereign State.Could participants inthese proceedings address the

Court on the principles and rules of international law, ifany, which, outside the
colonial context, permit the secessionof a territory from a sovereignState without the
latter's consent?" [JudgeKoroma]

INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE

ACCORDANCEWITHINTERNATIONALLAW OFTHEUNILATERAL
DECLARATIONOFINDEPENDENCEBYTHEPROVISIONAL
INSTITUTIONSOFSELF-GOVERNMENTOFKOSOVO
(REQUESTFORADVISORYOPINION}

RESPONSESUBMITTEDBY FINLAND
TO QUESTIONSOFJUDGEKOROMAANDJUDGECANÇADOTRINDADE

29 June 2000

QATAR'S RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE VERESHCHETIN TO

QATARANDBAHRAIN

On 15 June 2000, Judge Vereshchetinput the following question to the Parties:

"Before 1971, were there any international agreements concluded by the United

K.ingdom with Qatar and Bahrain respectively other than those establishing their
relationshipf protection?

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF füSTICE

ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE

UNILATERAL DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE BY

THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF­
GOVERNMENT OF I(OSOVO

Request for Advisory Opinion

Response by the Republic of Albania

to the Questions Asked by the Judges

21 December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Answer to the Question Asked by Judge Koroma

I. General Remarks

II. History ofInternational Law