Correspondence

PART IV

CORRESPONDENCE

QUATRIÈME PARTIE432 PART IV.-CORRESPONDENCE

1. THE ACTING SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS TO THE
PRESIDENT OF THE IKTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
21 December 1961.

[See pp. 1-2.1

2. LE GREFFIER AU MINISTRE DES AFFAIRES ÉTRANGÈRES D'AFGHAPJISTAK~

27 décembre 1961.
Monsieur le Ministre,

Correspondence

PART IV

CORRESPONDENCE

CORRESPONDANCE SECTION B.-CORRESPONDENCE
(UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v.BULGARIA)

SECTION B. -. CORRESPONDANCE
(ÉTATS-UNIS D'AMÉRIUUE c.BULGARIE)650 PART IV.4ORRESPONDENCE

1. THE AMBASSADOR TO THE NETHERLANDS OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMEKICA TO THE KEGISTRAR

Correspondence

PARTIV

CORRESPONDENCE

CORRESPONDANCE82 PIRT I\..-COHHESPOSDENCE

1. THE A>IBASSAUOK TO THE NETHEI<I.ANDS OF THE UKITEU KINGDOM
OF GREAT BHlTAlN AND NOKTHERN IKliLAND TO THI! KEGISTRAR OF THE
INTERN.4TIONAI. COURT OF JUSTICE

I3ritisli Embnssy, THE HAGUE

Comments of the United States on the Replies of Iran to the questions put by Judge Rigaux

COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES ON IRAN'S REPLY TO THE

QUESTIONS PUT BY JUDGE R.IGAUXTO BOTH PARTIES

Premièrequestion: quel est le statut juridique de plates-formes pétrolièresaménagéespar
un Etat sur son plateau continental? Quelles sont les compétencesexercéessur ces installations?

Quelle est la différenceentre le statut des plates-formes pétrolièresselon qu'elles sont localisées
respectivement dans la mer territoriale d'un Etat ou en dehors de celle-ci?

Comments on lran's Reply:

Correspondence

COURINTERNATIDE JUSTICE

DE CORFOU

INTERNATICOUROFJUSTICE

PLEADINORAL-RGUMENTDOCUMENTS

THE CORFU
CHANNEL CASETous droits réservéspar la

Courinternationale de Justice
Al1 rights reserved by the

Intemationai Court ef Justice

Nu de vente :
Sales nuniberAFFAIREDU DETROIT DE CORFOU

THE CORFU CHANNEL CASE COUINTERNATIONADEJUSTICE
-

-.
AFFATREDU DÉTROIT

Written reply of Bolivia to the question put by Judge Owada at the public sitting held on the afternoon of 8 May 2015

ESTADOPLURINACIONALDEBOLIVIA

Embajada La Haya - Paises Bajos

Bolivia's Response to the Question of Judge Owada

Bolivia has the honour herewith to submit its response to the question of Judge Owada on

defining the meaning of the term "sovereign access to the sea" and determining the specifie

content of that term as used for determining its position on the jurisdiction of the Court.

With regard to the relevance of this question to the jurisdiction of the Court, Bolivia observes

Subscribe to
Links