SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ONYEAMA

1 regret tliat 1 find niyself iiiiable to concur in tlic decision that the
Court is conipetent to entertain lndia's appeal.
The jurisdiction of the Court is derived froni the combincd effcct of
Article 36 (1) of the Statute of tlie Court, Article 84 of the Convention on
International Civil Aviation (the Convention) and Article 37 of the

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PETRÉN

[Translation;

To niy regret, 1 am unable to concur in the opinion of the majority
of the Court in respect of the question whether the Chicago Convention
and its annexes authorize India's appeal in the present case. In my view

72 ICA0 COUNCIL (DECL. ZAFRULLA KHAN)

the Council. Nothing urged by India's counsel in his submissions to the
Court in this context has served to raise any doubt in my mind concerning
the correctness and propriety of the President's rulings and of the pro-
cedure followed by the Council.
As regards the second category, the brief answer to India's objections
is that Article 15 of the Rules for the Settlement of Differences has no

71 ICA0 COUNCIL (DECL. ZAFRULLA KHAN)

President Sir Muhammad ZAFRULL KHAN makes the following decla-
ration:

1 much regret 1am unable to agree that Article 84 of the Convention
read with Articles 5 (4), 15 and 18 of the Rules for the Settlement of

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RIPHAGEN

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AMMOUN

[Translation]

1. At the beginning of his separate opinion in the Corfu Channelcase,
Judge A. Alvarez, alluding to the fundamental changes which have taken
place in every sphere of human activity in recent decades, and especially
in international affairs and international law, wrote:

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GROS

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PADILLA NERVO

In its Judgment of 24 July 1964the Court joined to the merits the third
preliminary opjection raised by the Spanish Government to the Applica-
tion of Belgium.
The Court then stated that:

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP

1. 1agree with the majority of the Courtthat the Belgian claim must be
dismissed, but slnce1reach that conclusion by different lines of reasoning,