SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE REZEK

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS

DECLARASION OF JUDGE HERCZEGH

[Translation]

Having voted against paragraphs 2 (a) and (b) and 3 of the operative
part, 1feel obliged to supply the explanations that follow:

JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES GUILLAUME AND
FLEISCHHAUER

[English Original Text]

Article79, paragraph 7, of the Rules of Court - Objection of mootness
having an exclusively preliminary character.
Actions of the United Kingdom in order to obtain the surrenderof the sus-
pects - Last substantivesubmissionof Libya directed againstthese action-
Jurisdiction of the Court in this respect only to the extent that the actionsin
questionwouldbe contrary to the Montreal Convention.

JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES BEDJAOUI, RANJEVA
AND KOROMA

[Translation]

JOINT DECLARATION OF JUDGES BEDJAOUI, GUILLAUME
AND RANJEVA

[Translation]

Article 31,paragraph5, of the Statut- UnitedKingdomand UnitedStates
parties in thesame interest- UnitedKingdom not being entitled to choosea
judge ad hoc.

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE FORTIER

Challenge of eighty-two (82) Qatari documents by Bahrain - Decision by

Qatar to disregard "non-authentic documents" - History of eighty-two (82)
documents including impact on Qatari claim to Hawar Islands - Qatar's new
argument - Potential damage to administration of internationaljustice.

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TORRES BERNARDEZ

Introduction: Territoriul und tllaritir~zeaspects ($the case - Applicuhility of

gen(.ral internutionul 1ai.i - B~~hruin'srcft.renc,eto quieta non movere and ils
contrudiction.~ - Drtcrt~litiutionof the c1c~menf.o sf'fuct - Hi.storica1,fact.sus
source qf originul title - Fuc.t.sulleged to generate u title ofeffectivités - Fuil-
urc to defrtzeu criticuI dut~l,for ~dllli.~~fhilitjo'f effectivités - 0hservution.s on

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AL-KHASAWNEH

Soi2ereigntyover Zuhurcih und owr the Hu\tur.s - C'o~trd teclined to rule on:

uti possidetis juris, original title, und inlpuct oj'effectivités - Preference fi)r
cornprehensive treutnzent of the crrgurnent.cp.resented - Confinonent bj the
Court to the vulidity alid hinding furcc~ of' the 1939 British decision - Too
re.stric.tiil- Territoriul c1uirn.sopc1nto judic.iu1scrutin}' -- Ahsrnce of' r~fer-

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KOOIJMANS

Historical context of dispute - Character of Britishpolicy in Gulfregion -