Separate opinion of Judge Keith

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE KEITH

1. The Court, in my view, should have exercised its discretion to refuse

to answer the question which the General Assembly submitted to it on
8 October 2008 in resolution 63/3. In this opinion I give my reasons for
that conclusion.
2. While the terms of the French text of Article 14 of the Covenant of
the League of Nations may have been read as denying the Permanent
Court of International Justice a discretion to refuse (the Court “donnera

Separate Opinion of Vice-President Weeramantry

SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT WEERAMANTRY

Importance of protection of United Nations personnel - Immunities of
United Nations functionaries distinguishedfrom those of State representatives
- Conclusivenessof Secretary-General's determination - Need for uniform
internationaljurisprudence on thismatter - Duty of rapporteursto ensure that
they act bvithinthe terms of their mandate.

1 agree with the conclusions of the Court as set out in the Court's

Links