Separate opinion of Judge Ago (translation)

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AG0

/Trunslurior~/

1. In the separate opinion which 1appended to the Judgment of 26 No-
vember 1984 on the jurisdiction of the Court and the admissibility of the
Application in the present case, 1explained why 1had felt able to vote in
favour of the findirig that the Court had "a jurisdiction in the present case
enabling it to proceed to examination of the merits", convinced as 1was

Separate opinion of Judge Elias

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ELIAS

1have voted, without enthusiasm, for subparagraphs (2) to (16) of the
operative clause, but 1 consider that subparagraph (1) of the operative
clause isout of place in the present Judgment. It isinappropriatebecause it
is contradictory to the Judgment already given in 1984,which, from the

Separate opinion of Judge Lachs

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS

At the outset, 1 am impelled to express my regret at what, to mymind, is
a strange occurrence in the present case. It was stated that much of the
evidence was "of a highly sensitive intelligence character" and asserted
that the Respondent would "not risk United States national security by
presenting such sensitive material in public".

Separate opinion of Judge Sir Robert Jennings

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR ROBERT JENNINGS

Whilst agreeing with the Court's decision that it hasjurisdiction under
the 1956Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation, in respect of

any breaches of the provisions of that Treaty, and that suchclaims arealso
admissible, 1regret that 1am unable to concur with the Court's decision
that it hasjurisdiction under Article 36,paragraph 2,of the Court's Statute.
1shall explain my reasons, as briefly as may be.

Links