DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT SH1
In voting in favour of opcralive paragraph 153 ol' Ihc Judgment, I
should liketo make it clear that I stillmaintain myviews ascxprcssed in
my separate opinion annexed to the Lacrand Judgment (I. C.J Reporrs
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA
1have voted in favour of the Judgment because 1have concludedthat
Italy has not committed any breach either of the 1948 FCN Treaty or
of the 1951 Supplementary Agreement, and that the United States of
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paragraphs
1. INTRODUCTIO NI. SEIN RESPECT OF THLEGALSITUATIO OF
THEMARITIMS EPACEOF THEGULFOF FONSECA 1-6
II. "BAYOR "HISTORIBCAY":LEGALCONCEPT UNDER THELAW OF
THESEA 7-26
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TORRES BERNARDEZ
1have voted for the operative part of the Judgment, except for sub-
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE VALTICOS
[Translation]
The preceding Judgment relates, as willhavebeen seen, to several land
sectors (six,to be moreprecise) and to disputes bearing on the islands and
the legal régime of the maritime spaces. On most of the findings of the
Chamber 1 amin agreementwithitsmembers - or withthe majority ofits
members - at least v~ithregard to essentials. With respect to other find-
DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA
1wish to put on record that 1do not share the views of the Chamber
concerning the effect of Nicaragua's intervention as expressed in para-
graphs 421-424of the Judgment.
What does it mean when the Chamber states :
413
DISSENTTNG OPINION OF JUDGE PAOLlLLO
[Trans/at ionJ
148
DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR ROBERT JENNINGS
1. 1regret that 1am not able to agreewith the Court's decision torefuse
Italy permission to intervenein the present case. 1am in entire agreement
with the Court that a right of intervention must be qualified by the
principle of theconsensualbasis of theCourt'sjurisdiction. Accordingly, 1
can also broadly agree with the proposition that Italy could not be per-
mitted, under the guiseof intervention, toattempt to seise the Court "of a
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
1. 1 regret that 1 am unable to concur in the Judgment of the Court
denying the request of Italy for permission to intervene in the pending
proceedings between Libya and Malta. Italy clearly "has an interest of a