DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EVENSEN

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA*

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS

[Translation]

I have voted against the Judgment as a whole, for reasons which I shall
set forth as succinctly as possible.
1. On account of theimportance of the Court's interpretation of its role

1O0

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JIMÉNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA*

PART1. INTERPRETATIO OFNTHE SPECIAL AGREEMENT

1. The Parties'Submissions

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL

1havevoted for and generally support theJudgment. However, it isnot
clearthat theCourt iscorrect in accordingtheKerkennahIslandsonly half

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AG0

[Translation]

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SIR GARFIELD BARWICK

1 have already expressed my reasons for being unable to join in the
Judgment of the Court in the case of Australia v. France.Al1those reasons
apply with equal force in this case and need not be repeated.

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGEDE CASTRO

[Translation]

To my regret, 1 have not been able to vote with the majority of the
Court. In view of the practically identical nature of the present case and
the case concerning Nuclear Tests (Australia v.France), at this stage of
the proceedings, 1 feel justified in referring the reader to the reasoning
set forth in the dissenting opinion 1 have appended to the Judgment
delivered in thatparallel case.

(Signed) F. DE CASTRO.

JOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES ONYEAMA,
DILLARD, JIMGNEZ DE ARÉCHAGA AND
SIR HUMPHREY WALDOCK

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE IGNACIO-PINTO

[Translation]

1 have voted in favour of the Judgment which the Court has given