INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS,
ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS
CASE CONCERNING THE
AERIAL INCIDENT OF
7 NOVEMBER 1954
(UNITED STATES OF AMERIv.
UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS)
ORDEROF 7 OCTOBER 1959
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
RECUEIL DES ARRETS,
AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES
AFFAIRE RELATIVE A
L'INCIDENT AÉRIEN DU
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
RECUEIL DEARRETS,
AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES
AFFAIRE DE LA COMPAGNIE DU PORT,
DES QUAIS ET DES ENTREPOTS
DE BEYROUTH ETDE LA
SOCIÉTÉ RADIO-ORIENT
(FRANCEc.LIBAN)
ORDONNANCE DU 31AOÛT '1960
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS,
ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS
CASE CONCERNING THE COMPAGNIE
DU PORT, DES QUAIS ET DES ENTREPOTS
DE BEYROUTHAND THE
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
RECUEIL DEARRÊTS,
AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES
AFFAIRE DE
LA BARCELONA TRACTION, LIGHT
AND POWER COMPANY, LIMITED
(BELGIQUE c. ESPAGNE)
ORDONNANCE DU 10 AVRIL 1961
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS,
ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDEKS
CASE CONCERNING
THE BARCELONA TRACTION, LIGHT
AND POWER COMPANY, LIMITED
(BELGIUM v. SPAIN)
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS,
ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS
CASE CONCERNING THE
AERIAL INCIDENT OF
27 JULY 1955
(UNITED KINGDOv.BULGARIA)
OBDER OF 3 AUGUST 1959
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
RECUEIL DES ARRETS,
AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES
AFFAIRE RELATIVE A
L'INCIDENT AÉRIEN DU
27 JUILLET 1955
(ROYAUME-UNCBULGARIE)
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
RECUEIL DES ARRETS,
AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES
AFFAIRE DE LA SOCIÉTÉ
ÉLECTRICITÉ DE BEYROUTH )>
(FRANCEc.LIBAN)
ORDON-NANCEDU 29 JUILLET1954
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS,
ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS
ccÉ~~~~~~~~~É DE BEYROUTH"
COMPANY CASE
(FRANCEvLEBANON)
COUR INTERNATIODELJUSTICE
RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS,
AVIS CONSU1,TATIFS ET ORDONNANCES
AFFAIRERELATIVE A LAPROTECTION
DE RESSORTISSANTSET PROTÉGÉS
FRANÇAIS EN ÉGYPTE
(DI'SISTE>.IENT)
ORDONNANCE DU 29 MARS 1950
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REPORTS OF JCDGMENTS,
ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS
CASECONCERNING THEPROTECTION
OF FRENCH NATIONALS AND
PROTECTEDPERSONSIN EGYPT
INTERNATIONALCOURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING PASSAGE THROUGHTHE GREAT BELT (FINLAND v.DENMARK) ORDER OF 10 SEPTEMBER 1992 COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRÊTS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE DU PASSAGE PAR LE GRAND-BELT (FINLANDE c. DANEMARK) ORDONNANCE DU 10 SEPTEMBRE 1992 Officia1cita:ion PassagethroughtheGreatBelt(Finlandv. Denmark), OrderofIOSeptember199Z.C.Jeports1992,p. 348 Modeofficiel de cit:tion Passagepar leGrand-Belt(Finlandec.Danemark), ordonnancedu0septembre199C.Z.Recueil1992,p.
This case arose out of certain measures adopted by the Lebanese Government with regard to two French companies. France instituted proceedings against Lebanon because it considered these measures contrary to certain undertakings embodied in a Franco-Lebanese agreement of 1948. Lebanon raised preliminary objections to the Court’s jurisdiction, but before hearings could be held the Parties informed the Court that satisfactory arrangements had been concluded. Accordingly, the case was removed from the List by an Order of 31 August 1960.
On 30 June 2017, Malaysia filed an Application requesting interpretation of the Judgment delivered by the Court on 23 May 2008 in the case concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore). In that Judgment, the Court had found that (1) sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh belonged to the Republic of Singapore, (2) sovereignty over Middle Rocks belonged to Malaysia, and (3) sovereignty over South Ledge belonged to the State in the territorial waters of which it was located.
In a letter dated 28 May 2018, the Co-Agent of Malaysia notified the Court that the Parties had agreed to discontinue the proceedings in the case. A copy of that letter was communicated to the Agent of Singapore who, by a letter dated 29 May 2018, confirmed his Government’s agreement to the discontinuance of the proceedings.
On 29 May 2018, the Court made an Order recording the discontinuance, by agreement of the Parties, of the proceedings instituted on 30 June 2017 by Malaysia against Singapore, and directed that the case be removed from the List.
On 2 February 2017, Malaysia filed an Application for revision of the Judgment rendered by the Court on 23 May 2008 in the case concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore). In that Judgment, the Court had found that (1) sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh belonged to Singapore, (2) sovereignty over Middle Rocks belonged to Malaysia, and (3) sovereignty over South Ledge belonged to the State in the territorial waters of which it was located.
In a letter dated 28 May 2018, the Co-Agent of Malaysia notified the Court that the Parties had agreed to discontinue the proceedings in the case. A copy of that letter was communicated to the Agent of Singapore who, by a letter dated 29 May 2018, confirmed his Government’s agreement to the discontinuance of the proceedings.
On 29 May 2018, the Court made an Order recording the discontinuance, by agreement of the Parties, of the proceedings instituted on 2 February 2017 by Malaysia against Singapore, and directed that the case be removed from the List.