DISSENTING OPINION BY M. CAICEDO CASTILLA
[Translation]

DISSEXTING OPINION BY JUDGE AZEVEDO

[T~aflslation]
Much to my regret, I am obliged to dissent from the reasons and
the conclusions adopted by the Court in its Judgment and to state
my persona1 views on those various points.

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE READ

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE BADAWI PASHA
[TrnnslationJ

1 share the opinion of the Court on the various conclusions except
those relating to the American practice, the "question of urgency",
and the maintenance of asylum until August 31st, 1919, the date
of the -4ct of Lima.
To explain my dissent on the question of urgency, it will be
necessary to recall the circumstances in which asylum was granted
on January 3rd. 1949, and which are set out in the judgment of the
Court.

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE ALVAREZ
[Translation]

1

Importance of.the Colombian-Peruvian Asylum case. Questions which
should be considered.

DISSEXTISG OPINION OF JUDGE J. E. READ

DISSENTING OPINION OF SIR ARNOLD McNAIK

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE HSU MO

1 agree with the finding of the Court that the method of straight
lines used in the Xorwegian Royal Decree of July ~zth, 1935, for
the delimitation of the fisheries zone, is not contrary to inter-
national law. But 1 regret that 1 am unable to share the view of
the Court that al1 the straight base-lines fixed by that Decree are
in conformity with the principles of international law.