SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BASDEVANT

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KRYLOV
[Translation.]

1share the Court's Opinion on the General Question and on Ques-
tions (a) and (c) put by the Assembly. 1 would observe, however,
that the analysis of Article 79, as given by the Court, does not
exhaust al1 the questions which may be raised in this connexion.

But 1 cannot concur in the second part of the reply given by the
Court to Question (b). My reasons are as follows:

LlISSENTIKG OPINIOX OF Mr. DE VISSCHEX

1 regret that 1 am unable to concur in the second part oi the
Court's ansurer to the question iin(ler-letter (5). 1 concede that the
provisions of Chapter XII of the Charter do not iniposc on thr
Union of South Africa a legal obligation to conclude a Tr.iisteeship
Agreement, in the sense that the Union is free to accept or to refuse
the particular terins of a draft agreement. On the other liarid, I

DISSENTING OPINION OF lilr. ALVAREZ
[Translation.]
1

SEPARATE OPINION BY Jt-DGE READ

1 concur in the part of the Opinion which answers Ouestioris (b)
lnd (cj-dealing with the application of Chapter XII of the Charter,

SEPARATE OPINION BY SIR ARNOLD McNAIR

DISSENTING OPINION RY JI7L)GE LEVI CARNEIRO

[Translation]
Having, to my iregret, given an answer different froni that of
the Court to the cluestions submitted to it, 1 must set out very
briefly the groundc; for my opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION BY JGDGE HACK\VORTH

DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE ALVAREZ
[Translation]

The question referred to the International Court of Justice
by the General Assembly of the United Nations for an Advisory
Opinion in the matter of the Effect of Awards of Compensation
made by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal in favour

INDIVIDUAL OPIXION BI' JCDGE B. WISIAKSKI

[Translation]
The Advisory Opinion indicates that the question submitted to
the Court concerns only awards made by the Administrative