SEPARATEOPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC SEPULVEDA
Thzrdcase before the Court clarmzngbreaches rn the applicatronand inter-
pretatlon of VzennaConventionon ConsularRelations - Basrcagreement with
thefindrngsof the Court, butreservatronsabout certurnconclusrons - Untimely
objections onjurzsdzctronand adrnrsszbzhty - Restrzcted interpretatronof the
responszbzlityof States
SEPARATEOPINION OF JUDGE TOMKA
Diplomatic protection - Distinciiun between rights of the Srare and indi-
vlrdu righ~s - Invocafion ofindil~iduurlights h&re un iniurnutionnl court by
Stare of nutimalily - Objection based on nun-exhau.rtir~onj'lr~cnlrunedies.
SEPARATEOPINION OF JUDGE PARKA-ARANGUREN
The CO~.WII[of lhe Unilud Stales nol to ruise prel~rnirtaryobjeclion-
Mextcn did not discharge ilYburdenof proving theMP-Y~CU nHiionnlity oj~hc
52 persons illdicated In it.$ e~norial- Mul~rple r~uiii~ttulcases - Tlte
exhaustion 14 1r)culretnpdiasrul- Ohl~goliilto rcj11ytoull thcquestlnnsrrs
slated hy Mesicu in its$nrrlcubnlissions- Final consideroions.
SEPARATEOPINlON OF JUDGE VERESHCHETIN
TWOheud~ uqflhr Mexican claims- Trwtmenf by heCourt of the ruleof
exh~u.stionoflocal remedies - "Mixed" claims in the jurisprudeirceof he
Cvurt nnd in the ILU Drajt A~r6icde .n DiplornoticProtection- Rea.~onsfor
the applicationof')rrpnndernnce" srundurdandfor non-applicationnj'ihelocrii
remediesreguir~menrin rhespeciul uircurnslnncesof t11ecase.
DECLARATION OF VICE-PRESIDENT RANJEVA
DECLARATION OF PRESIDENT SH1
In voting in favour of opcralive paragraph 153 ol' Ihc Judgment, I
should liketo make it clear that I stillmaintain myviews ascxprcssed in
my separate opinion annexed to the Lacrand Judgment (I. C.J Reporrs
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA
1have voted in favour of the Judgment because 1have concludedthat
Italy has not committed any breach either of the 1948 FCN Treaty or
of the 1951 Supplementary Agreement, and that the United States of
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ODA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paragraphs
1. INTRODUCTIO NI. SEIN RESPECT OF THLEGALSITUATIO OF
THEMARITIMS EPACEOF THEGULFOF FONSECA 1-6
II. "BAYOR "HISTORIBCAY":LEGALCONCEPT UNDER THELAW OF
THESEA 7-26
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TORRES BERNARDEZ
1have voted for the operative part of the Judgment, except for sub-