37
CERTAIN ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY NICARAGUA
IN THE BORDER AREA
(COSTA RICA V. NICARAGUA)
REJOINDER OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
ON COMPENSATION
Annexes
38
39
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX
No.
PAGE
1
Report on Methodology for Valuing Environmental
Damage Compensation (Second Report), Cymie R.
Payne, J.D., and Robert E. Unsworth, 25 August
2017
41
2 Response to “Review of the report by G.M. Kondolf
PhD (Annex 2),” G. Mathias Kondolf, PhD,
24 August 2017
83
40
41
Annex 1

27
LIST OF ANNEXES No. Document Page 1 Report by Fundación Neotrópica on the Question of the Methodology for the Assessment of Environmental Damage, 2017 29 2 Review of the report by G.M. Kondolf Phd (Annex 2), by Professor Colin R Thorne, 2017 163
28
29
Annex 1
Report by Fundación Neotrópica on the Question of the Methodology
for the Assessment of Environmental Damage
3 August 2017
30
31

95
CERTAIN ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY NICARAGUA
IN THE BORDER AREA
(COSTA RICA V. NICARAGUA)
COUNTER-MEMORIALOF THE REPUBLIC OF
NICARAGUA
ON COMPENSATION
Annexes
9697LIST
97
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX
No.
PAGE
1 Report on Environmental Damage Valuation by Professor
Cymie R. Payne, J.D., Rutgers University, and Robert E.
Unsworth, Industrial Economics, Incorporated, 26 May
2017
99
2 Review of Costa Rica’s Claims for Compensation in the
Río San Juan Delta, G. Mathias Kondolf, PhD, May 2017
153

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICECERTAIN ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY NICARAGUA IN THE BORDER AREA (COSTA RICA v. NICARAGUA)MEMORIAL OF COSTA RICAON COMPENSATIONVOLUME I3APRIL 2017
VOLUME II

77
LIST OF ANNEXES
Technical Reports
No.
Document
Page
1.
Fundación Neotrópica, “Monetary Valuation of the environmental damages arising from the construction of caños and clearing of trees and vegetation performed by the Government of Nicaragua in the Costa Rican territory on Isla Portillos, as required by the Judgment of the International Court of Justice of 16 December 2015”, 3 June 2016
English translation
85
2.

1
Replies from the Republic of Vanuatu and the Melanesian Spearhead Group to the
questions put by Judges Cleveland, Tladi, Aurescu and Charlesworth at the end of the
public sitting of Friday 13 December in the oral proceedings concerning the request for
an advisory opinion on the Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change
20 December 2024
Contents
Question put by Judge Cleveland: ................................ …………………………………………..2

List of Annexes Accompanying the
Written Replies of the United States of
America
December 20, 2024
ANNEX DESCRIPTION
1 RICHARD K. GARDINER, TREATY INTERPRETATION (2d. ed. 2015) [excerpt]

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST BY THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION
“OBLIGATIONS OF STATES IN RESPECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE”
WRITTEN REPLIES OF
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DECEMBER 20, 2024
- 1 -
Question put by Judge Cleveland

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
OBLIGATIONS OF STATES IN RESPECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE
(REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION)
URUGUAY
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS PUT BY JUDGES
CLEVELAND, TLADI, AURESCU AND CHARLESWORTH
20 December 2024
1
I. Question put by Judge Cleveland
1. “During these proceedings, a number of participants have referred to the production of
fossil fuels in the context of climate change, including with respect to subsidies. In your
view, what are the specific obligations under international law of States within whose