Separate Opinion by Judge Shahabuddeen
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE EVENSEN
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TARASSOV
1have unfortunately been obliged to vote against the Order by which
the Court has decided that the Application by Nicaragua for permission
to intervene under Article 62 of the Statute in the case concerning the
Land, Island and Maritime FrontierDispute (El Salvador/Hondurasj
shouldbe dealt with by the Chamber formed to deal with the case.
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ELIAS
DECLARATION OF JUDGE ODA
While 1am in full agreement withthe Court in itsviewthat :
"it is forthe Chamber formed to deal withthe present case to decide
whether the application forpermission to interveneunder Article 62
of the Statute filed by the Republic of Nicaragua on 17November
1989should be granted",
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
DECLARATlON OF JUDGE ODA
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
1 have voted in favour of the Court's rejection of the United States
request to dismiss Nicaragua's case onjurisdictional grounds. 1have sup-
ported the Court's indication of three provisional measures, namely :