Comments of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the questions
submitted by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade on December 11,
2009 with respect to the request of an advisory opinion on the
"Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of
lndependence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of
Kosovo"
CORRESPONDANCE 295
La Libye, signataire de la convention sur le droit de la mer de 1982, nesaurait
valablement contester la validité desr6giescodifiéespar cette convention.
44.THE AGENT OF THE LIBYANARAB JAMAHlRlYA
TO THE REGISTRAR
19June 1985.
1have the honour to fwnish the Court with Libva'sresnonses to the auestions
put to Libya hy Judge Elias and Judge Oda.
372 BORDER AND TRANSBORDER ARMED ACTIONS
7 July 1988
I h;ivc th< hunour to rcfcr to the qur.stioiis put to the Pnrtics hv hlcmbcr, of
22-12-2009 17:ss P.02
INTERîNA.TIONAI~COURT OltJUSTlCE
R~ëst,fir:·an Advisory Opinion
:r.'ls:JlYnîlatettl ëclaranonof-1ndepe1Ule,itëby th:e'Provisional
ln~tîtütioniQfSeljJGtJvemmen tf Kosovo·inaccotdance. with
.intirrttatioiw.l ?''
l(EPJJµ()Fl1iE GoVERNMENT OF AUSTRIA TO AiDDJTION~~
QIJÈS1:I0NS BYTHE COURT
[Translation]
Reply of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
to the question of President SCHWEBEL
1.Libya's case, such as it was argued during the hearing on Wednesday 22 October 1997, is that there
has been an abuse or misuse of power if the Security Council has determined that there exists a
threat to the peace as the basis for requiring Liba to surrender the accused to the United States
or to the United Kingdom.
Legality of the Use by a.State of !"uclear Weapons in Armed Conjlict
Legality of the Threat or Use ofNuclear Weapons
Licéitée l'utilisation des armes nucléairespar un Etat diJnsun conflit armé
Licéitéde la menace oul'emploi d'armes nucléaires
WRITTEN REPLIES TO QUESTIONS PUT BY
MEMBERS OF THE COURT
RÉPONSES ÉCRITES AUX QUESTIONS POSÉES PAR
LES MEMBRES DE LA COURWHO Response of the World Health Organization
Question of Vice-President Schwebel
In these proceedings, both Parties cite documents from the
ratification processes of treaties of friendship, commerce and
navigation to shed light on their intentions in concluding the
1955 Treaty of Amity, Economie Relations and Consular Rights in
the terms in which it was concluded.
INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE
ACCORDANCEWITHINTERNATIONALLAWOF
THE UNILATERALDECLARATIONOFINDEPENDENCEBYTHE
PROVISIONALINSTITUTIONSOFSELF-GOVERNMENTOFKOSOVO
(REQUESTFORANADVISORYOPINION)
ANSWEROFTHE REPUBLICOFSERBIATOTHE QUESTIONSPUTTO
THEPARTICIPANTSIN THEORALPROCEEDINGSBYJUDGESKOROMA,
BENNOUNAANDCANÇADOTRINDADE
1. QUESTIONPUTBYJUDGEKOROMA
The question:
"Ithas been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a
384 BORDERANDTRANSBORDERARMEDACTIONS
rcply gitcn Ii? Your E~cel1r.n~~ai the sanie sittii(<,<pro p. 141) cvcn ihoush
iiw:i~thcn dcscribcd as "3 parii:ll answer". andiiu,a,furihcr stated ai ihe<II-
ting i~i14Junr. 1988that ihc question< put w<~ulrh lc :lnsu,crcd in writing
104. THE AGENT OF HONDURAS TO THE REGISTRAR
The Hague, 19July 1988.
INTERNATIONCOURTOFJUSTICE
CASECONCERNINAGRMED
ACTIVITIES
ONTHETERRITORY
OFTHECONGO
DEMOCR TICREPUBLIOFTHECONGO
v.
UGANDA
UGANDA'OBSERVATIONOSNTHEDRC'SRESPONSESOJUDGESQ' UESTIONS
13MAY20051. Uganda's Observations on the DRC's Response to the Question of Judge Vereshchetin