other_document

3 August 20.20
Mr. Philippe Gautier
Registrar
International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
2517 KJ The Hague
Netherlands
Dear Sir:
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
254 South Road & Shiv Chanderpaul Dr.,
Georgetown. Guyana
Telephone: 592-226-9080 Fax; 592-223-5241
Email: minister@,minior.gov.gy
Website: www.mmfor.gov.gy
I have the honour to respond to your letter of 28 July 2020, which conveyed a copy of a

(r/ /iro rk/ Aclerr .-41////c/ r, //a ye/
.14dr/clone.; crrierloice;
(lc /a -14r/eciiireri.Aolivaylain/ c/c reexercht
DM N° 000930
Caracas, July 24, 2020
Your Excellency
Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf
President of the International Court of Justice
The Hague,
Excellency,
In its Order dated 19 June 2018, the International Court of Justice
decided, "pursuant to Article 79, paragraph 2, of its Rules, that, in the
circumstances of the case, it must resolve first of all the question of the Court's

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
GUYANA v. VENEZUELA
HEARING ON THE QUESTION OF THE COURT'S JURISDICTION
Response of the Co-operative Republic of Guyana
to the question posed by Judge Bennouna on 30 June 2020
6 July 2020
Question: "In paragraph 2 of article 4 of the Geneva Accord of the 17th of February 1966
concludes in an alternative according to which either the controversy has been resolved
or indeed that all the means of peaceful settlement stipulated in Article 33 of the Charter

lh(1ucsl h􀂎• lhc Unikd Najion." General Assembly for au !\.th•isory Opinion on the
••Legal consct111cnccs ofthe sep􀂏1rnlion of me Chagos A1·chipclaJ?,o from Maurilius in 19(,5 ..
Wrillcn comments of the Unitc<l States or America on States· Written Replies
nr Sc Jtcmbcr I l, 2018 to the c. ucstions oscc.l b Jug 1 c Can ·ado􀔽·1·rindadc
I. The l lnitcd S1,1tcs offers three observations on the Wrillen Replies of States to the questions
posed by Judge Canc;ado-Trin<ladc on September 5 (hcrcinaller. ''the replies").

WRITTEN REPL Y OF THE AFRICAN UNION TO
JUDGE CANCADO TRINDADE'S QUESTION
"As recal/ed in paragraph (a) of the U.N General Assembly's request for an
Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice (General Assembly
resolution 71/292 of 22.06.2017), the General Assembly refers to obligations
enshrined into successive pertinent resolutions of its own, as from 1960, namely:
General Assemb/y reso/utions 1514(XV) of 14.12.1960, 2066(XX) of 16.12.1965,
2232(XXI) of 20.12.1966, and 2357(XXII) of 19.12.1967.

WRITTEN COMMENTS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MAURITIUS
ON THE RESPONSES OF THE UNITED KJNGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES TO
,JUDGE CANÇADO TRINDADE'S QUESTION
The United Kingdom and the United States have replied to Judge Cançado Trindade's
question by repeating their arguments that General Assembly resolutions 15 l 4(XV), 2066(XX),
2232(XXI), and 2357(XXII) did not reflect customary international law at the time the Chagos
Archipelago was detached from Mauritius, were not legally binding on the administering power and

Rcqucst by the United Nations Gcncral Asscmbly for an Advisory Opinion on the
"Lcgal conscqucnccs of the scparation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965"
Written comments of the United States of America on the Written Reply of Mauritius
of September 7, 2018 to the question posed by Judge Gaja
1. The United States offers three observations on the Written Reply of Mauritius to the
following question posed by J udge Gaja on September 3: "In the process of decolonization

..
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE SEPARATION OF THE CHA GOS ARCHIPELAGO
FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965 (REQUEST FOR AD V/SOR Y OPINION)
EFFETS JURIDIQUES DE LA SEPARATION DEL 'ARCHIPEL DES CHAGOS DE
.. MAURICE EN 1965 (RliQUETEPOURAVISCONSULTATJF)
Judge Gaja: ln the process of decolonization relating to the Chagos Archipelago, what is the
relevance of the will of the population o/Chagossian origin?
Comment of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF
THE SEPARATION OF CHAGOS FROM MAURITIUS IN 1965
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
Written comment of the Argentine Republic in relation to the reply by the Republic of
Mauritius to the question put by Judge Gaja
In view of the possibility given by the Court to participants to the oral proceedings,
Argentina presents the following wrillen comment in relation to the reply by the Republic
of Mauritius to the question put by Judge Gaja at the end of the hearing on 3 September
2018 in the morning.

WRITTEN REPL Y OF THE AFRICAN UNION TO JUDGE GAJA1S QUESTlON
"ln the process .of dee:olonization relatihg to the Chagos Archipelago, what is
the relevance of the wlll pf the population ofChagossfan origin?11
1. The Afrfcan Union fully agrees with the reply of the Republic Mauritius concerning
the relevance of the Will of the people of Mauritius, including the Will of the
populatîon of Chagossîan origin, in the process of decolonization of Maurice in
1965/1968.
. 2. As the African U11fon has emphasized in its Written Statement, its Written