other_document

Title
Other documents

Response of the experts to Costa Rica's written observations on their report

RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS OF COSTA RICA ON THE REPORT SUDMITTED ON
30 APRIL 2017 8\' THE EXPERTS APPOINTED BV THE COURT
IN THE CASE CONCERNING MARITIME DELIMITATION IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE
PACIFIC OCEAN (COSTA RICA V. NICARAGUA)
Costa Rica's written observations on our Report of 30 April 2017 were transmitted tous by a
letter of the Registrar dated 2 June 2017. This letter also informed us thal Nicaragua indicated
that it would not make written observations on our Report.

Letter of Nicaragua concerning the report of the experts

Exccllcncy,
EMDASSY OF NICARAGUA
THE HAGUE
The llaguc, 1 June 20 17
REF: HOL-EMB-123
1 have the honour to refer to the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and
the Pacifie Ocean (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) which has been joined with the case concerning the Land
Boundary in lhe Northern part of Isla Porti/los (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), particularly to your lener
148492 transmitting the report prepared by the experts appointed by the Court, as wells as the meeting

Written observations of Costa Rica on the report of the experts

Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacifie Ocean
(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), joined with the Case Concerning Land Boundary
in the Northern Part of Isla Portillos (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)
Observations of Costa Rica upon the Report
prepared by the Court-appointed Experts
Pursuant to the Court's communication dated 1 May 2017, reference 148491, in the case
concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean Sea and the Pacifie Ocean (Costa Rica v.

Comments of France on the replies of Equatorial Guinea to the questions put by Judge Bennouna and Judge Donoghue at the public sitting held on 19 October 2016 at 5 p.m

Letter to the Registrar dated 31 October 2016 from the Agent of France

[Translation]

With reference to the case concerning Immunities and Criminal Proceedings (Equatorial
Guinea v. France), please find enclosed herewith our comments on the Republic of Equatorial
Guinea’s replies to the questions put by Judge Bennouna and Judge Donoghue, which the French
Republic wishes to bring to the Court’s attention.

Written replies of Equatorial Guinea to the questions put by Judge Bennouna and Judge Donoghue at the public sitting held on 19 October 2016 at 5 p.m.

Letter dated 26 October 2016 from the Agent of Equatorial Guinea to the Registrar

[Translation]

With reference to the case concerning Immunities and Criminal Proceedings
(Equatorial Guinea v. France), I have the honour to communicate to you the replies of
Equatorial Guinea to the questions put by Judge Bennouna and Judge Donoghue at the public
sitting of 19 October 2016.

Written reply of Colombia to the questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the public sitting held on the morning of 2 October 2015

REPUBLICADECOLOMBIA
I\IIINISTERIO DE RELA.CIONES EXTERIORES

The Ha!,'ll, October20 15

Sir,

With reicrence to the oral proceedings on preliminaryobjections in the case conceming
Alleged Violations q{'So1•ereignRights and Afaritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicl'.gua

Colombia), 1have the honourto referto thequestionsfonnulated by Judge CançadoTrindadeat
theend ofthe hearingheld on 2 October2015,at 10a.m.

Written reply of Nicaragua to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the public sitting held on the morning of 2 October 2015

EMBASSY OF NICARAGUA
THE HAGUE

The Hague, 09 October5201
REF:HOL-EMB-179

Excellency

1have the honour to refer to the questions put forward by H.E. Judge Cançado
Trindade at the endhe hearing held on Friday, 02 October 2015, with reference to

the case concemingeged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the

Caribbeanea (Nicaragua v. Colombia).

Links