Annex to LUS 92/17
Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel
Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
Annex Al to GEN90/13
Letter dated 13 February 1990 from the Agent of
Guinea-Bissau to the Registrar
[Translation)
Brussels, 13 February 1990
No. 1.57/EGBB/1990
Sir,
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY
(CAMEROON V.NIGERIA)
Observations ofthe Republic of Cameroon on the responses by the Federal Republic of
Nigeria to the questions put to it byMembers of the Court
JUDGE FLEISCHHAUER'S QUESTIONS
1.Judge Fleischhauer put the following questions to the two Parties:
BELGIUM S RESPONSE TO J UDGE C ANÇADO T RINDADE
1. The questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade may be set out as follows:
1. For the purposes of a proper understanding of the rights to be preserved (under Article41 of
the Statute of the Court), are there rights corresponding to the obligations set forth in Article 7,
paragraph1, in combination with Article5, paragraph2, of the 1984 United Nations
Convention Against Torture?”
2. “[. . .] if so, what are their legal nature, content and effects?”
Letter to the Registrar dated 13 June 2011 from
the Agent of Cambodia
[Translation]
Please find below some comments on the reply provided by Thailand to the question put by
Judge Cançado Trindade.
Firstly, Cambodia notes that Thailand gives very little information on the area of the Temple
No. 35001/ R~c Royal Thaï Embassy
The Hague
14 June B.E. 2554 (2011)
Sir,
I have the honour to refer to the Request for Interpretationof the Judgement of
r. ,.,f /..'.,., •
- ·.•r,~; .:1!,1
....v J .,....~......
UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES
]
l
l
l
l
INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE
l
CERTAIN ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY NICARAGUA IN THE BORDER AREA
l (COSTA RICA V. NICARAGUA)
J
] Comments on the Reply of Nicaragua
1
J
Questions putby Judge Simma
}
J 1. Judge Simma's frrst question was the following:
Case concerning Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite
(Belgium v. Senegal)
Comments of the Kingdom of Belgium on the response of the Republic of Senegal to the
questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade