Provisional measures

r. ,.,f /..'.,., •
- ·.•r,~; .:1!,1
....v J .,....~......

UNITED NATIONS NATIONS UNIES

]

l

l

l

l
INTERNATIONALCOURTOFJUSTICE
l

CERTAIN ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY NICARAGUA IN THE BORDER AREA

l (COSTA RICA V. NICARAGUA)

J
] Comments on the Reply of Nicaragua

1

J
Questions putby Judge Simma
}

J 1. Judge Simma's frrst question was the following:

Case concerning Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite

(Belgium v. Senegal)

Comments of the Kingdom of Belgium on the response of the Republic of Senegal to the
questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade

- 2 -

Letter to the Registrar dated 6 June 2011 from

the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find below the replies of Cambodia to the questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade
at the end of the sitting of 31 May.

Cambodia has understood the questions as pertaining to the population displacements, firstly,

Question: In the present request for the indication of provisional measures by the
Court, it is stated, inter alia, that, as a result of the incidents occurred since 22 April
2011 in "the area of the Temple ofPreah Vihear", as weil as at other places along the

boundary between the two contending States, "fatalities, injuries and the
displacement of local inhabit~ n trs"aused.

What further information can be provided by the Parties to the Court about

Reply of the Republic ofNicaragua to the questions put by Judges Simma, Bennouna

and Greenwood at the end ofhearing on provisional measures requested by Costa Rica

in the case concerning Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

Judge SIMMA:

1. Before the hearing of 11 January 2011, did Nicaragua ever make, or attempt to

The Hague,
THE EMBASSY OF THE SOCIALIST FEDERAL 30, GROOT HERTOGINNELAAN
REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA
INTHE NETHERLANDS

A 41/93-22
No. ....-.···-----··-······

Sir,

I have the honour to transmitt to you the answer from the legal

Adviser of the ~ederal Ministry of ~oreign Affairs, which revresents
the formal reply of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to the questi­

Letter to the Registrar dated 15 April 2009 from

the Agent of the Republic of Senegal

[Translation]

Subject: Caseconcerning Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite
(Belgium v. Senegal)

I have the honour to transmit to you the response of the Republic of Senegal to the question
put by Judge Cançado Trindade on 8 April 2009. It reads as follows:

“Senegal has the honour to respond to the question put to it by

SENEGAL ’S COMMENTS ON BELGIUM ’S RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION
PUT BY JUDGE CANÇADO TRINDADE ON 8 A PRIL 2009

In accordance with Article72 of the Rules of Court, Senegal has been invited to comment

upon Belgium’s response, of 15 April 2009, to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade.

The Senegalese Government notes that, in th e first paragraph of its response, Belgium

expresses the view it shares with Senegal that the va rious elements of this question relate to the
merits of the case.

Pax Ho, 99391-40209327