R EQUEST FOR THE INDICATION OF PROVISIONAL MEASURES SUBMITTED
BY THE G OVERNMENT OF E QUATORIAL G UINEA
[Translation]
I. Introduction
1. I have the honour to refer to the Application submitted to the Court on 13 June 2016
instituting proceedings in the name of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea (hereinafter “Equatorial
[Translation]
Reply by Senegal to the questions put on 12 February 1990
by Judge Oda
First Question
Under what internal law or acts of Senegal did the Senegalese Navy
board the fishing vessel Hoyo Maru No. 8 and take it to the port of
Dakar on 9 October 1989, and was the Captain of the vessel subjected to
judicial proceedings as a result of which he was ord.ered to pay a fine of
Annex to LUK92/18
Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel
Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
10 and 12) applies when the "persan" who has committed the offence and is
Annex to LUS 92/17
Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel
Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
Annex Al to GEN90/13
Letter dated 13 February 1990 from the Agent of
Guinea-Bissau to the Registrar
[Translation)
Brussels, 13 February 1990
No. 1.57/EGBB/1990
Sir,
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY
(CAMEROON V.NIGERIA)
Observations ofthe Republic of Cameroon on the responses by the Federal Republic of
Nigeria to the questions put to it byMembers of the Court
JUDGE FLEISCHHAUER'S QUESTIONS
1.Judge Fleischhauer put the following questions to the two Parties:
BELGIUM S RESPONSE TO J UDGE C ANÇADO T RINDADE
1. The questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade may be set out as follows:
1. For the purposes of a proper understanding of the rights to be preserved (under Article41 of
the Statute of the Court), are there rights corresponding to the obligations set forth in Article 7,
paragraph1, in combination with Article5, paragraph2, of the 1984 United Nations
Convention Against Torture?”
2. “[. . .] if so, what are their legal nature, content and effects?”
Letter to the Registrar dated 13 June 2011 from
the Agent of Cambodia
[Translation]
Please find below some comments on the reply provided by Thailand to the question put by
Judge Cançado Trindade.
Firstly, Cambodia notes that Thailand gives very little information on the area of the Temple
No. 35001/ R~c Royal Thaï Embassy
The Hague
14 June B.E. 2554 (2011)
Sir,
I have the honour to refer to the Request for Interpretationof the Judgement of