CORRESPONDENCE 503

66, THE REGISTRAR TO THE AGENT OF THE UBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA

27 January 1984.

I have the honour toacknowledge receipt of the letter dated 23 January 1984
in which you give your views on the accessibility to the public of the written
observations of the Parties on Italy's Application for permission to intervene in
the case conceming the Continental Shelf (Lihyan Arah Jamahiriya/Ma/ta).

Reply of the French Republic to questions posed by Judges Koroma
and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

[Translation]

Reply of the French Republic to the question

posed by Judge Cançado Trindade

1. Judge Cançado Trindade’s qu estion relates to two sets of problems, one of which, for the

Letter to the Registrar dated 13 June 2011 from

the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find below some comments on the reply provided by Thailand to the question put by
Judge Cançado Trindade.

Firstly, Cambodia notes that Thailand gives very little information on the area of the Temple

290 DEMANDEEN REVISIONET ENINTERPRETATION

ta1Shelf (Tunisia/tibyan Arab Jamahiriya)is an accurate cnpy; and that al1
translations are accurate translations.

43. L'AGENTDE LA TUNISIEAU GREFFIER

19juin 1985.

22.DEC.2009 15:01 0038138213183 s #2304 P.003 /018

I. Judge Koroma's Question

1.Judge Koroma asked the following question:

1. In its response to the question from Judge Schwebel, the Applicant
states that

Question put by Judge Koroma

It has been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a territory
from a sovereign State. Could participants in these proceedings address the Court on the
principles and rules of international law, if any, which, outside the colonial context, permit the

secession of a territory from a sovereign State without the latter' s consent?

Answer of the United States of America

REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA

TERRITORIALANDMARITIMEDISPUTE

(NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA)

PROCEEDINGS ON WHETHER TO GRANT COSTA RICA'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO
INTERVENE

The Hague, 22 October 2010

ANSWER TO JUDGE DONOGHUE'S QUESTION

Question : Nicaragua bas made written and oral sùbmissions to the Court regarding

A. Questionaddressedby Judge Koroma:

"It has been contented that international law does not prohibit the secession of a territory from a
sovereign State. Could participants in these proceedings address the Court on the principles and rules

of internationallaw, if any, which, outside the colonial context,permit the secession of a territory from

a sovereignStatewithout the latter's consent?"

Remania's approach

1. During the written and oral proceedings of the case regarding the Accordance with

INTERNATIONAL C OURT OF J USTICE

Case concerning
Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite
(Belgium v. Senegal)

Supplementary written replies of the Government of Senegal to the questions put
by judges at the close of the hearing held on 16 March 2012

submitted by