Nigeria's reply to the questions put by Judges Fleischhauer, Kooijmans and Elaraby and Nigeria's comments on Cameroon's reply to the questions put by Judge Fleischhauer

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING
.THE LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY
BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA

(Carrieroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening)

Comments of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

on the answers to the Judges' Questions

submitted by Cameroon on 10 Marèh 2002

4 April2002 1

Comments on the answers to the Judges' Questions submitted by Cameroon on

1 0 March 2002

Written answers of Italy to the questions posed by Judges Oda and Lacharrière at the hearing held on 30 January 1984

CORRESPONDENCE 505

In truth it may be said that very often the terms "median line" and "equidis-
tant line" are used interchangeably and no sofe conclusions canbe drawn from
the use of either of lhese terms. For exarnple, the geographical situation be-

Reply of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

Comments of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to the questions

submitted by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade on December 11,

2009 with respect to the request of an advisory opinion on the

"Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of

lndependence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of

Kosovo"

Written answers of Libya to the questions posed by members of the Court during the oral proceedings

CORRESPONDANCE 295

La Libye, signataire de la convention sur le droit de la mer de 1982, nesaurait

valablement contester la validité desr6giescodifiéespar cette convention.

44.THE AGENT OF THE LIBYANARAB JAMAHlRlYA
TO THE REGISTRAR

19June 1985.

1have the honour to fwnish the Court with Libva'sresnonses to the auestions
put to Libya hy Judge Elias and Judge Oda.

Reply of Austria to question posed by Judge Cançado Trindade
at the close of the oral proceedings

22-12-2009 17:ss P.02

INTERîNA.TIONAI~COURT OltJUSTlCE

R~ëst,fir:·an Advisory Opinion

:r.'ls:JlYnîlatettl ëclaranonof-1ndepe1Ule,itëby th:e'Provisional

ln~tîtütioniQfSeljJGtJvemmen tf Kosovo·inaccotdance. with

.intirrttatioiw.l ?''

l(EPJJµ()Fl1iE GoVERNMENT OF AUSTRIA TO AiDDJTION~~

QIJÈS1:I0NS BYTHE COURT

Answers of Libya to questions put by the President and Judge Koroma

[Translation]

Reply of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
to the question of President SCHWEBEL

1.Libya's case, such as it was argued during the hearing on Wednesday 22 October 1997, is that there
has been an abuse or misuse of power if the Security Council has determined that there exists a
threat to the peace as the basis for requiring Liba to surrender the accused to the United States
or to the United Kingdom.

Written Replies by Australia, France, Indonesia, Iran, Mexico, Malaysia, Zimbabwe, Samoa, Salomon Islands, Marshall Islands, United Kingdom and United States of America to Questions put by Judges

Legality of the Use by a.State of !"uclear Weapons in Armed Conjlict

Legality of the Threat or Use ofNuclear Weapons

Licéitée l'utilisation des armes nucléairespar un Etat diJnsun conflit armé

Licéitéde la menace oul'emploi d'armes nucléaires

WRITTEN REPLIES TO QUESTIONS PUT BY

MEMBERS OF THE COURT

RÉPONSES ÉCRITES AUX QUESTIONS POSÉES PAR

LES MEMBRES DE LA COURWHO Response of the World Health Organization

Links