DISSENTING OPINION
OF JUDGE "AD HOC" OFFERHAUS
[TransZationj
I. In this case, which concerns the application of the Convention
of 1902 on guardianship, the question is one of an infant of Dutch
nationality, born on May 7th, 1945, in Sweden, the daughter of a
father of Dutch nationality and of a mother Swedish by birth, who
had acquired Dutch nationality by her marnage. The mother died
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CORDOVA
Much to my regret, 1 have to disagree with both the reasoning
and the conclusion reached by the Court in this case.
The judicial authorities of Sweden set up the guardianship of
Marie Elisabeth Boll, a minor living in Sweden but of Dutch
nationality, on March 18th, 1954. This guardianship, according
to Swedish law, only refers to the administration of the interests
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE WINIARSKI
SEPARATE OPINION OF SIR PERCY SPENDER
Whilst concurring in the decision of the Court 1 deem it appro-
priate to deal individually with and to make certain additional
observations upon certain aspects of this case.
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE WELLINGTON KOO
1am in agreement with the operative part of the Judgment of the
Court, but 1 find more direct justification for it in Articl7 of the
Convention of 1902 governing the guardianship of infants and 1
propose to develop the reasons for my opinion.
The Swedish measure of protective upbringing applied to Marie
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORENO QUINTANA
[Translation]
To my great regret, although 1 am fully in agreement with them
concerning the judgment at which they arrive in this case, 1 am
SEPARATE OPINION OF
JUDGE SIR HERSCH LAUTERPACHT
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BADAWI
[Translntionj
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HSU MO
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KLAESTAD
The Hellenic Government, which has not made any declaration
under Article 36 (2) of the Court's Statute, contends that the juris-
diction of the Court can be derived from Article 29 of the Treaty
of Commerce and Navigation of 1926 between Great Britain and
Greece. The text of this Article is as follows :