Separate opinion of Judge Yusuf
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE YUSUF Disagreement with reasoning leading to determination of amounts of compensation —Disagree also with radical reversal of burden of proof — It requires Uganda to prove double negative fact with respect to injuries in Ituri — A requirement not supported by practice of the Court — Also, inconsistent with nature of duty of vigilance incumbent upon occupying Power as obligation of conduct — Determination of “global sums” by reference to equitable considerations and “range of possibilities indicated by evidence” leaves much to be desired — Equitable considerations n