written_pleading

Title
Written proceedings

Reply of Nicaragua

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISPUTE CONCERNING THE QUESTION OF THE DELIMITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND COLOMBIA BEYOND 200 NAUTICAL MILES FROM THE NICARAGUAN COAST (NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA) REPLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA VOLUME I 9 July 2018

Counter-Memorial of Colombia

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE _____________________________________________ QUESTION OF THE DELIMITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND COLOMBIA BEYOND 200 NAUTICAL MILES FROM THE NICARAGUAN COAST (NICARAGUA v. COLOMBIA) COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA VOLUME I 28 September 2017

Memorial of Nicaragua

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISPUTE CONCERNING THEQUESTION OF THE DELIMITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF BETWEENNICARAGUA AND COLOMBIA BEYOND 200NAUTICAL MILES FROM THE NICARAGUAN COAST (NICARAGUA V.COLOMBIA)MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA 28 September 2016

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
DISPUTE CONCERNING THE
QUESTION OF THE DELIMITATION OF THE CONTINENTAL SHELF BETWEEN
NICARAGUA AND COLOMBIA BEYOND 200 NAUTICAL MILES FROM THE
NICARAGUAN COAST
(NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA)
MEMORIAL
OF THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
28 September 2016

Declaration of intervention of Maldives

1
Before the
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
DECLARATION OF INTERVENTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF MALDIVES
Intervention pursuant to Article 63 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice
In the case of
APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND
PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE
(THE GAMBIA v. MYANMAR)
10 November 2023
2
To the Registrar, International Court of Justice (the “Court”), the undersigned being duly
authorised by the Government of the Republic of Maldives:

Joint declaration of intervention of Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom

JOINT DECLARATION OF INTERVENTION OF
CANADA, THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF
GERMANY, THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN
AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Pursuant to Article 63 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice
In the case of
APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF
GENOCIDE
(THE GAMBIA v. MYANMAR)
To the Registrar of the International Court of Justice (“the Court”), the undersigned being duly

Request for the indication of provisional measures

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ruSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
ARBITRAL AW ARD OF 3 OCTOBER 1899
CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA
v.
BO LIV ARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA
GUYANA'S REQUEST FOR PROVISIONAL MEASURES
27 October 2023
REQUEST OF THE COOPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA FOR
PROVISIONAL MEASURES
1. Pursuant to Article 41 of the Statute of the Court and Articles 73 and 7 4 of the Rules, the Cooperative
Republic of Guyana ("Guyana") hereby requests that the Court indicate
provisional measures against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela ("Venezuela") as

Written observations of Denmark on the subject-matter of its intervention

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Written Observations of
THE KINGDOM OF DENMARK
5 July 2023
In the case of
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THE
PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE
(UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
2115
I. INTRODUCTION
I. On 5 June 2023, the International Court of Justice ("the Court'') decided that the
declarations of intervention under Article 63 of the Statute of the Court ("the Statute'')
submitted by, among others, Denmark ("Order on Admissibility of the Declarations of

Written observations of Slovenia on the subject-matter of its intervention

WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA
5 July 2023
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THE
PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE
(UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION: 32 STATES INTERVENING)
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
I. THE PRINCIPLES RELEVANT TO THE CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION
OF ARTICLE Ⅸ AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONVENTION ......................... 2

Written observations of Portugal on the subject-matter of its intervention

International Court of Justice
Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
(Ukraine v. Russian Federation: 32 States Intervening)
Written Observations of the Portuguese Republic
on the Construction of Article IX of the Genocide Convention and of Other Provisions
Relevant the Determination of the Jurisdiction of the Court
5July2023
I . Introduction
1. On 26 February 2022, Ukraine instituted proceedings at the International Court of

Links