written_pleading

Title
Written proceedings

Written statement of Nauru

REPUBLIC OF NAURU
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF
ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING EAST
JERUSALEM
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)
ORDER OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
OF
3 FEBRUARY 2023
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF
NAURU
Page 2 of 6
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF
ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING EAST
JERUSALEM
(REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION)

Written statement of Guatemala

1
Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem
(Request for Advisory Opinion)
Written Statement
Republic of Guatemala
I. Introduction
1. The United Nations General Assembly adopted, on 30 December 2022, Resolution 77/2471. Said Resolution in its Paragraph 18 requests the International Court of Justice an advisory opinion. The said paragraph reads as follows:

Written statement of Czechia

International Court of Justice
Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied
Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem
(Request for an advisory opinion)
Written statement of the Government of the Czech Republic
July 2023
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 66 (2) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice,
and in response to the invitation by the Registrar of the International Court of Justice
(hereinafter as the "Court") in its Order of 3 February 2023, the Government of the Czech

Written statement of Morocco

Note: This translation has been prepared by the Registry for internal purposes and has no official
character
18836
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE POLICIES
AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY,
INCLUDING EAST JERUSALEM
(REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION)
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
25 July 2023
[Translation provided by the Kingdom of Morocco and revised by the Registry]
1
Unofficial translation
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

Written statement of Yemen

INTRODUCTION
WRITTEN STATEMENT
OF
THE REPUBLIC OF YEMEN
25 July 2023
1. The Republic of Yemen has the honour to submit this Written Statement in accordance with
the Order of the International Comi of Justice of3 February 2023 in the matter concerning
Legal Consequences arising fiwn the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied
Palestinian Territo,y, including East Jerusalem. This Written Statement briefly addresses
the issues referred to the Court by the United Nations General Assembly in resolution
77 /24 7 of 30 December 2022.

Written statement of Italy

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ARISING FROM THE
POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF ISRAEL IN THE
OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY, INCLUDING
EAST JERUSALEM
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ITALY
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF ITALY
INTRODUCTION
By Resolution 77/247 adopted on 30 December 2022, the General Assembly decided, in
accordance with Article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations, to request the International
Court of Justice, pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, to render an advisory opinion

`Written statement of the State of Israel

Sr.q.rnuaNToFTHE Srnrn or Isru,nr, pURSUANT TorHE CouRt's OnnnRor3 Fnnnu.q,Rv
2023 nnIauNG To THE ADVISoRY PRoCEEDINGS INITIATED sy UN GTNNN,q.L ASSNMSI,Y
Rnsolurrox771247
The State of Israel attaches great importance to the peaceful settlement of disputes and to the significant
role carved out for the Intemational Court of Justice for this purpose. It moreover respects and
welcomes the appropriate use of the Court's advisory function in a manner consistent with the Court's
Statute.

Observations on the request for additional measures under Article 75(1) of the Rules of Court

OBSERVATIONS Of THE STATE OF ISRAEL ON THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA'S "URGENT
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL MEASURES UNDER ARTICLE 75(1) OF THE RULES OF COURT"
DATED 12 FEBRUARY 2024
1. Israel regrets that South Africa seeks once again to misuse the Court's provisional
measures procedure, this time by a highly peculiar and improper request that makes reference
to Article 75(1) of the Rules of Court.
2. At the outset, Israel again places on record its principled position that South Africa's

Links