Preliminary objections

Code
2

Georgia's comments on the Russian Federation's written response to the questions put by Judges Koroma, Abraham and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE
ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION

(GEORGIA vRUSSIAN FEDERATION)

COMMENTS OF GEORGIA ON THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S
ANSWERS TO JUDGES' QUESTIONS

1OCTOBER 2010 COMMENTS OF GEORGIA ON THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S ANSWERS TO
JUDGES' QUESTIONS

QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA

The question:

Written response of the Russian Federation to the questions put by Judges Koroma, Abraham and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE

ELllvllNATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIALDISCRIMINATION

(GEORGIA vRUSSIANFEDERATION)

REPLIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO THE

QUESTIONS PUTTO THE PARTIES DURING THE ORAL

HEARING BYJUDGES KOROMA,ABRAHAM

AND CANÇADO TRINDADE

A. QUESTION PUT BYJUDGE KOROMA

"What precisely, in the view of the Parties, is the object and purpose of

Written response of Georgia to the questions put by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COl'i'VENTION ON THE
ELI1\1INATION OF ALL FOR1VISOF RAClAL DISCRIMINATION

(GEORGIA v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)

ANS\VERS OF GEORGIA TO JUDGES' QUlrSTIONS

24 SEPTEMBER 2010 A.NSW"ERSTO JUDGES' QUESTIONS

ANSWER TO QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA

The question:

What precisely, in the view of the Parties, is the abject and purpose of the clause

Subscribe to Preliminary objections
Links