i ,'
CASE CONCERNING OIL PLATFORMS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
PRELIMINARYOBJECTION
COMMENTS OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
ON THE U.S. RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION OF JUDGE HIGGINS
In its response to the question of Judge Higgins, the United
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY
(CAMEROON V.NIGERIA)
Observations ofthe Republic of Cameroon on the responses by the Federal Republic of
Nigeria to the questions put to it byMembers of the Court
JUDGE FLEISCHHAUER'S QUESTIONS
1.Judge Fleischhauer put the following questions to the two Parties:
•.
'
31/05 _:.~.1S: 08 F,U
flJ003
Correction to the Responses of the Federal Republlc of Nigeria
to the Judges' Questions
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
.THE LAND AND MARITIME BOUNDARY
BETWEEN CAMEROON AND NIGERIA
(Carrieroon v. Nigeria: Equatorial Guinea intervening)
Comments of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
on the answers to the Judges' Questions
submitted by Cameroon on 10 Marèh 2002
4 April2002 1
Comments on the answers to the Judges' Questions submitted by Cameroon on
1 0 March 2002
[Translation]
Reply of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
to the question of President SCHWEBEL
1.Libya's case, such as it was argued during the hearing on Wednesday 22 October 1997, is that there
has been an abuse or misuse of power if the Security Council has determined that there exists a
threat to the peace as the basis for requiring Liba to surrender the accused to the United States
or to the United Kingdom.
Question of Vice-President Schwebel
In these proceedings, both Parties cite documents from the
ratification processes of treaties of friendship, commerce and
navigation to shed light on their intentions in concluding the
1955 Treaty of Amity, Economie Relations and Consular Rights in
the terms in which it was concluded.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON TE-ffi
ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(GEORGIA v.RUSSIAN FEDERATION)
COMMENTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
ON THE WRITTEN REPLIES OF GEORGIA TO THE QUESTIONS
PUTTO THE PARTIES DURING THE ORAL HEARING
BY JUDGES KOROMA AND CANÇADO TRINDADE
1 October 2010
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE
ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(GEORGIA vRUSSIAN FEDERATION)
COMMENTS OF GEORGIA ON THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S
ANSWERS TO JUDGES' QUESTIONS
1OCTOBER 2010 COMMENTS OF GEORGIA ON THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S ANSWERS TO
JUDGES' QUESTIONS
QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA
The question:
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING LEGALITY OF USE OF FORCE
FURTHERDOCUMENTSSUBNDTTEDBY
THE RESPONDENTS PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE 56 OF THE RULES OF THE COURT
FEBRUARY 2004
/
1 ..
27 February2004