Nicaragua's comments on Costa Rica's written response to the question put by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on Friday 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

A NNEX TO N ICARAGUA S COMMENTS ON THE RESPONSE OF THE C OSTA R ICAN
G OVERNMENT TO THE QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE B ENNOUNA

Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia)

Application for permission to intervene filed by the Republic of Costa Rica

[Translation by the Registry]

1. At the end of the public hearing held on Friday 15October2010, JudgeBennouna
addressed the following question to Costa Rica:

Written response of Costa Rica to the question put to it by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

TERRITORIAL ANDMARITIME DISPUTE

NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA

APPLICATION BY COSTA RICA FOR PERMISSION TO lNTERVENE

COSTA RICA'S ANSWER TO THE HONOURABLE JUDGE BENNOUNA'S QUESTION

1. At the conclusion of the oral pleadings on Costa Rica's application for permission

to intervene in the case concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua/

Colombia), Judge Bennouna posed to Costa Ricathe following question:

Belgium's comments on Senegal's response to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting of 8 April 2009 (translation)

Case concerning Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite

(Belgium v. Senegal)

Comments of the Kingdom of Belgium on the response of the Republic of Senegal to the
questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade

Written response of Singapore to the question put to it by Judge Keith at the public sitting held on 23 November 2007

30.NOV.2007 11:55 EMBRSSY OF SINGRPOREIN BRUSSELS N0.210 P.6

CASE CONCERNING SO"VEREIGNTY OVERPEDRABRANCAl
PULAUBATUPUTEH, MIDDLEROCKS ANDSOUTHLEDGE

(MALA YSIA/SINGAPORE)

RESPONSE OF SINGAPORE TO THE QUESTION POSED BY
JUDGE KEITH TO SINGAPORE ON 23 NOVEMBER 2007

Question

Nicaragua's comments on Costa Rica's written response to the questions put to the Parties by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna at the end of the public sitting held on 12 March 2009

Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

NICARAGUA'S

COMMENTS ON COSTA RICA'S WRITTEN REPLY OF 19 MARCH 2009

(To the questions putto the Parties by at the close of the public sitting

of 12 March 2009 by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna)

The Answers to the Question put by Judge Koroma

Written response of Costa Rica to the questions put to the Parties by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna at the end of the public sitting held on 12 March 2009

Case conceriiing Navigational and Related Rights

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

Cnc;taRica's Replies to Questions asked by ,JudgesKoroina, Keith and Bennouna

Costa Rica would answer these three questions as follows. Extracts of the publicly
available texts cited (where notready annexed to the pleadings) aratt~ched.
1

A. Question by Judge Koroma

Can either Party provide evidence as to whether Costa Rican locals and

Replies of Burkina Faso and Niger to the questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on 17 October 2012 (translation)

Written replies of Burkina Faso to the questions put to the Parties by

Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting
held on 17 October 2012

1. At the end of the public sitting held on 17 October 2012, Judge Cançado Trindade put the
following questions to the Parties:

Communication from the Agent of Argentina commenting on the response given by Uruguay to the question put to the latter by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on 29 September 2009

Argentina's written comments to Uruguay's reply to Judge Bennouna's question "JVhat
process and products are used by the Botnia plant for its cleaning?"

1. At the end of the hearings held on 29 September 2009 Judge Bennouna asked

the following question:

JVhatprocess and products are used by the Botnia plant for its cleaning?
Uruguay was asked to provide a reply by 9 October 2009, and Argentina was

provided with an opportunity to respond by 19 October 2009.

Links