Question put to the Parties by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on 12 October 2012 at 3 p.m.: Communication by Burkina Faso of the text of the reply given orally by Mr. Pellet (translatio

Letter to the Registrar dated 24 October 2012
from the Agent of Burkina Faso

[Translation]

Re: Question put by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing of 12 October 2012

At the end of the hearing held on the af ternoon of 12October, Judge Bennouna put the
following question to both Parties: “To what exte nt and for which section(s) do each of the Parties
agree to refer to the 1960 IGN map to establish the course of the frontier between them?”

Written replies of Italy to the questions put by members of the Chamber of the Court on 23 February 1989

CORRESPONDENCE 457

Final Submissions of rheGovernmeniof the UnitedSraresin rhecme concerning
Elettronica Sicula S.P.A.

The United States requests that the objection of the Respondent be dismissed
and submits to the Court that it is entitled to a declaration and judgment that:

Observations of the Republic of Djibouti on the reply given by the French Republic to the question put by Judge Simma at the close of the first round of oral argument (translation)

Letter dated 1 February 2008 to the Registrar from the Deputy Agent

of the Republic of Djibouti

[Translation]

In reference to the explanations given by the French Republic on 29 January 2008 during the
second round of oral argument in reply to a question put by JudgeSimma on 25January2008
during the first round of oral argument, I have the honour, on the instructions of the Agent of the
Republic of Djibouti, to submit the following observations to the Court.

Written response of Greece to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on 16 September 2011 (translation)

R ESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PUT TO G REECE
BY J UDGE C ANÇADO T RINDADE

1. It should first be recalled that the Special Supreme Court (SSC) does not rank as a
supreme court within Greece’s legal order. The SSC has a sui generis legal status in the Greek
system of courts. With its dual jurisdic tional role under Article100 of the 1975 Greek

Written response of Georgia to the questions put by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COl'i'VENTION ON THE
ELI1\1INATION OF ALL FOR1VISOF RAClAL DISCRIMINATION

(GEORGIA v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)

ANS\VERS OF GEORGIA TO JUDGES' QUlrSTIONS

24 SEPTEMBER 2010 A.NSW"ERSTO JUDGES' QUESTIONS

ANSWER TO QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA

The question:

What precisely, in the view of the Parties, is the abject and purpose of the clause

Written response of Germany to the questions put by Judge Bennouna, Judge Cançado Trindade and Judge ad hoc Gaja at the end of the public sitting held on 16 September 2011

[Translation by the Registry]

I.) Question put to Germany by Judge Bennouna at the end of the public sitting of
16 September 2011

If no other remedy is available for individual victims of serious violations of human rights or

humanitarian law committed on their territory by a foreign State, would it be admissible for the
latter to raise a plea of immunity from jurisdiction jure imperii before the courts of the forum
State?

Subscribe to
Links