Written answer of Canada to the question posed by the President of the Chamber on 5 May 1984
CORRESPONDENCE 375
118. THE AGENTOF THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA TO THE REGISTRAR
8 May 1984
1have the honour to transmit herewith Canada's reply to the question' posed
by the President of the Chamber to Mr. Fortier on 5 May 1984.
Responseio the Questionof the Presidenr of rite Chamber. 5 May 1984
Written answers of Libya to the questions posed by Judges Mosler, Oda and Schwebel
502 COSTtNEhTAL SHELF
128. THE AGENT OF THE LIBYAN ARAB JAXlAHIRII'A. TO THE REGI-RAR
1have the honour to enclose the response or Libya to the questions posed by
Judges Mosler, Oda and Schwcbcl.
Noting that Judge Mosler'squestion refers only to paragraph I of Article 76
of the draR convention. the Libyan Jamahiriya regard the first par{ of this
paragraph as representing existing. customary law. This is for the reason that.
Written answer of Libya to the questions posed by Judge Gros
CORRESPONDENCE
126. L'AGENT DE LA JAMAHlRlYA ARABE LIBYENNE AU GREFFIER
19 octobre 1981 .
Comments in writing of Honduras on the written reply by Nicaragua to the question put by Judge Simma at the public sitting held on 20 March 2007
EMBASSY OF HONDURAS TO THE KINGDOM
OF THE NETHERLANDS
28 March 2007
Sir,
Georgia's comments on the Russian Federation's written response to the questions put by Judges Koroma, Abraham and Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting held on Friday 17 September 2010
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE
ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
(GEORGIA vRUSSIAN FEDERATION)
COMMENTS OF GEORGIA ON THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S
ANSWERS TO JUDGES' QUESTIONS
1OCTOBER 2010 COMMENTS OF GEORGIA ON THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S ANSWERS TO
JUDGES' QUESTIONS
QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA
The question:
Written answers of Nicaragua to the questions posed by members of the Court during the oral proceedings
424 MlLlTARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES
Comments of the Democratic Republic of the Congo on Belgium's Reply to the Question put by Judge Koroma
CASE CONCERNING THE ARREST WARRANT OF 11 APRIL 2000
(D EMOCRATIC R EPUBLIC OF THE C ONGO v. BELGIUM )
Comments of the Democratic Republic of the Congo on the reply of the Kingdom of Belgium
to the question put by Judge Koroma
Written reply of the Republic of Colombia to the question put by Judge Bennouna at the public sitting held on the afternoon of 4 May 2012
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores
Republica de Colombia
Question putto both Parties by Judge Bennouna
at the end of the public sitting of 4 May 2012, afternoon
« Les règles posées à l'article 76 de la convention des Nations Unies de 1982 sur le droit de la
mer, pour la détermination de la limite extérieure du plateau continental au-delà des 200 milles marins,
peuvent-elles être considérées aujourd'hui comme ayant le caractère de règles de droit international
coutumier ? »
Comments of the Kingdom of Thailand on the reply given by the Kingdom of Cambodia to the question put to both Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade
No. 35001/ R~c Royal Thaï Embassy
The Hague
14 June B.E. 2554 (2011)
Sir,
I have the honour to refer to the Request for Interpretationof the Judgement of