Reply of the Argentine Republic to the questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings (translation)

Reply of the Argentine Republic to questions posed by Judges Koroma
and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

[Translation]

Question posed by Judge Koroma:

“It has been contended that international law does not prohibit the secession of a

territory from a sovereign State. Could participants in these proceedings address the
Court on the principles and rules of international law, if any, which, outside the

Malaysia's comments on Singapore's written response to the question put by Judge Keith to the Parties at the public sitting held on 16 November 2007

Case Concerning Sovereignty Over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle
Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore)

Malaysia's Comments on Singapore's Response to

Judge Keith's Question of 16 November 2007

Malaysia makes the following comments:

1. Malaysia agrees that the statement of law in the Court of Appeal judgment

was not necessary to the disposai of the appeal. lt is, therefore, obiter.

Reply of the Netherlands to questions posed by Judges Koroma and Cançado Trindade
at the close of the oral proceedings

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE UNILATERAL
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE BY THE PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS

OF SELF-GOVERNMENT OF KOSOVO

(REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION)

REPL Y TO QUESTIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE COURT

BY THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

21 DECEMBER 20091. Introduction

Comments of the Democratic Republic of the Congo on the replies given by the Republic of Uganda to the questions put by Members of the Court at the close of the first round of oral argument (translati

DEMOCRATie REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO

Comments on the replies given by Uganda to the questions put by Judges Vereshchetin,
Kooijmans and Elaraby during the oral proceedings in the case concerning
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo

(Democratie Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)

13 May 2005

Written answer of the United Kingdom to the question posed by Judge Hsu on 17 May 1952

ZI mai 1952.
Monsieur l'Agent,
Ala date du 17mai 1952. VOUS avez bien voulu déposerles conclusions
du Gouvernement hellenique en l'affaire Ambatielos.
Le texte signépar vous contient les mots suivants, à la fi11du premier
paragraphe :n ....et égalementles articles Iet 3 dutraitédu 16juillet!
1926 ...8. Je vous serais obligéde bien vouloir me faire connaître si
ces numéros d'articles sont bien exacts oii s'il ne convient pas plut6t
de lirecles articlesI et 4 du traité ».

Costa Rica's comments on Nicaragua's written response to the questions put to the Parties by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna at the end of the public sitting held on 12 March 2009

Case concerning Navigational and Related Rights

(Costa Rica v Nicaragua)

Costa Rica's comments on Nicaragua's response to the Questions asked bv
.TudgesKoroma, Keith and Bcnnouna

Costa Rica's comments on Nicaragua's responsc to the question asked by

Written response of Nicaragua to the questions put to the Parties by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna at the end of the public sitting held on 12 March 2009

Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

NICARAGUA'S

ANSWERS TO JUDGES' QUESTIONS

(Put to the Parties at the close of the public sitting of this case on 12 March 2009
by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna)

ANSWER TO QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA

The question:

Can either Party provide evidence as to whether Costa Rican locals and immigrants used

Written response of Serbia to the question put to the Parties by Judge Abraham

Response to the Question raised by Judge Ab1 aham

On 28 May 2008, Judge Abraham posed the following question to both parties:

Les Parties se sont référées, entre autres, aux affaires rs la Licéité de l'emploi de la
force, dans lesquelles la Cour ajugé en 2004 qu'elle n'avait pas compétence pour connaître des
requêtes de la Serbie-et-Monténégro, au motif que cet Etat ne remplissait pas les conditions à lacès

Written reply of the Republic of Honduras to the question put by Judge ad hoc Gaja at the public sitting held on 16 March 2007

QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE AD HOC GAJA

May Logwood Cay and Media Luna Cay be currently regarded as islands within the
meaning of Article 121, paragraph 1, ofthe UnitedNations Convention on the Law of the

Sea?

1. On 22"d March 2007 Counsel for Honduras provided a preliminary response in
answer to the question from Judge ad hoc Gaja, on the basis of the evidence that

Subscribe to
Links