Correspondence

PART IV

CORRESPONDENCE

CORRESPONDANCE SECTION B.-CORRESPONDENCE
(UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v.BULGARIA)

SECTION B. -. CORRESPONDANCE
(ÉTATS-UNIS D'AMÉRIUUE c.BULGARIE)650 PART IV.4ORRESPONDENCE

1. THE AMBASSADOR TO THE NETHERLANDS OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMEKICA TO THE KEGISTRAR

Correspondence

PARTIV

CORRESPONDENCE

CORRESPONDANCE82 PIRT I\..-COHHESPOSDENCE

1. THE A>IBASSAUOK TO THE NETHEI<I.ANDS OF THE UKITEU KINGDOM
OF GREAT BHlTAlN AND NOKTHERN IKliLAND TO THI! KEGISTRAR OF THE
INTERN.4TIONAI. COURT OF JUSTICE

I3ritisli Embnssy, THE HAGUE

Comments of the United States on the Replies of Iran to the questions put by Judge Rigaux

COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES ON IRAN'S REPLY TO THE

QUESTIONS PUT BY JUDGE R.IGAUXTO BOTH PARTIES

Premièrequestion: quel est le statut juridique de plates-formes pétrolièresaménagéespar
un Etat sur son plateau continental? Quelles sont les compétencesexercéessur ces installations?

Quelle est la différenceentre le statut des plates-formes pétrolièresselon qu'elles sont localisées
respectivement dans la mer territoriale d'un Etat ou en dehors de celle-ci?

Comments on lran's Reply:

Correspondence

COURINTERNATIDE JUSTICE

DE CORFOU

INTERNATICOUROFJUSTICE

PLEADINORAL-RGUMENTDOCUMENTS

THE CORFU
CHANNEL CASETous droits réservéspar la

Courinternationale de Justice
Al1 rights reserved by the

Intemationai Court ef Justice

Nu de vente :
Sales nuniberAFFAIREDU DETROIT DE CORFOU

THE CORFU CHANNEL CASE COUINTERNATIONADEJUSTICE
-

-.
AFFATREDU DÉTROIT

Written reply of Bolivia to the question put by Judge Owada at the public sitting held on the afternoon of 8 May 2015

ESTADOPLURINACIONALDEBOLIVIA

Embajada La Haya - Paises Bajos

Bolivia's Response to the Question of Judge Owada

Bolivia has the honour herewith to submit its response to the question of Judge Owada on

defining the meaning of the term "sovereign access to the sea" and determining the specifie

content of that term as used for determining its position on the jurisdiction of the Court.

With regard to the relevance of this question to the jurisdiction of the Court, Bolivia observes

Written answer of Australia to the question posed by Judge Gros at the hearing of 25 May 1973

372 NUCLEAR TESTS

the terms of Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, in the N~iclear Tests case

(Aitsrralia v. France). 1have the honour to sendyou herewith three copies of the
bilingual edition. printed by the Registry, of that Application.

74. THE REGISTRAR TO THE SECRETARY-GENER AFLTHE UNITEDNATIONS'

30 May 1973

Correspondence

CORRESF'ONDENCE

CORRESF'ONDANCE636 AERIAI. INCIDENT

standardof e.r uJI;ciojudicial probity caseof non-appearanceshouId be
higher than when a Respndent appearsand dcfcnds its case in a contentiuus
pr&ing but does not raisequestionsof juridiction.
The Applimni ducs not deny chatif jiirisdictionalquestionare propmIy

Correspondence

CORRESPONDANCE

CORRESPONDENCE 1. LE CONSEILLER JURIDIQUE DES NATIONS UNIES AU GREFFIER '
ftc;légrui91111e)

14 dfcembre 1974

Assemblée générale a sa 2318eséancele 1 3 décembrea adopte par $7 voix
contre O.avec 43 abstentions. résolution 3292(XXIX)concernant qiieslion du
Sahara espagnol. Texte non officiel suit:

Subscribe to
Links