SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI
[Translation]
1. 1wish to give the reasons why, in my view, the Court's 1962Judg-
ment on the preliminary objections was no bar to the rejection of the
claim on the merits on the ground of its not being based on substantive
rights pertaining to the Applicants.
can indeed be very considerable,-but this is a differentthing. It operates
on the political not the legal level: it does not make these resolutions
binding in law. If the "necessity" argument were valid therefore, it
would be applicable as much to trusteeships as it is said to be to man-
dates, because in neither case could the administering authority be
coerced by means of the ordinary procedures of the organization.
Theconclusion to be drawn is obvious.
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES HACKWORTH,
BADAWI, LEVI CARNEIRO AND SIR BENEGAL RAU
We feel bound to dissent from the Court on the conclusions
relating to consular jurisdiction, fiscal immunity and the inter-
pretation of Article 95 of the Act of Algeciras.
Consulaj rurisdiction
DISSENTING OPINION BY DR. ECER.
[Traitsldion .]
Part 1 of the SpeQal Agreement.
Criminal character of the incident on Octoberzznd, 1946.
DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE AZEVEDO.
[Translation.]
1.-The purpose of the following observations is to explain
the reasons which compel me, to my regret, to differ from certain
of the grounds and certain of the findings of the Judgment.
DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE KRYLOV.
I. Albania's connivance has not been proved.
DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE BADAWI PASHA.
[Translatio~z.]
1 agree with the Court's findings on the facts, as stated in the
Judgment (pp. 12-15), and with its rejection of the contention that
Albania herself laid the mines.
DISSENTING OPINION BY JUDGE \VINIARÇKI.
[Translation.]
INDIVIDUAL OPINION BY JUDGE ALVAREZ.
[Translation.]
1 am in agreement with the Judgment delivered by the Court,
but 1feel that it is desirable to give prominence to certain consider.
ations of a legal character in support of that Judgment.
The cataclysm through which we have just passed opens a new
ern in the history of civilization;it is of greater importance than
al1those that preceded it : more important than that of the Renais-
sance, than that of the French Revolution of 1789 or than that