71 ICA0 COUNCIL (DECL. ZAFRULLA KHAN)

President Sir Muhammad ZAFRULL KHAN makes the following decla-
ration:

1 much regret 1am unable to agree that Article 84 of the Convention
read with Articles 5 (4), 15 and 18 of the Rules for the Settlement of

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE RIPHAGEN

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AMMOUN

[Translation]

1. At the beginning of his separate opinion in the Corfu Channelcase,
Judge A. Alvarez, alluding to the fundamental changes which have taken
place in every sphere of human activity in recent decades, and especially
in international affairs and international law, wrote:

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GROS

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE PADILLA NERVO

In its Judgment of 24 July 1964the Court joined to the merits the third
preliminary opjection raised by the Spanish Government to the Applica-
tion of Belgium.
The Court then stated that:

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE MORELLI

[Translation]

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE JESSUP

1. 1agree with the majority of the Courtthat the Belgian claim must be
dismissed, but slnce1reach that conclusion by different lines of reasoning,

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE TANAKA

Although 1 subscribe to the Court's conclusion in dismissing the
Belgianclaimthat Spainviolated an international obligation and incurred
responsibility vis-à-vis Belgium, 1 regret to have to say that my view
differs from that of the Court in its reasoning. The majority opinion

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE

SEPARATE OPINION
OF PRESIDENT BUSTAMANTE Y RIVER0

[Translation]

1 subscribe to the reasons on which the Court has based its Judgment
in the BarcelonaTraction case. Nevertheless, certain very special aspects
ofthis casehave prompted meto certain additional reflectionsconcerning
the question of the law applicable, and1feel it right that 1should com-
municate them as concerning matters of doctrine. 1consider, moreover,