Declaration of Judge Tarassov

DECLARATION OF JUDGE TARASSOV

1have voted for the present Order, albeit not without some hesitation.
Asitseemsto me,the continuation ofthe construction work on the East
Channel Bridgeover the Great Belteven now constitutes a serious threat
to the continued, unimpeded passage of international shipping through
this international strait. The present bridgeroject has been conceivedin
such a way that not only after its final realization, but even during the
construction process, it would impose serious physical limitations upon

Separate Opinion of Judge Oda

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA

1. For purely procedural reasons, 1 did not support the request of El
Salvador for an oral hearing relating to its Declaration of Intervention at

this present stage. 1wish in this opinion to clarify those reasons and to
expressmy unease at what 1believetohavebeen unfortunate aspects of the
procedure followed by the Court in this case.

Separate Opinion of Judge Nagendra Singh

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NAGENDRA SINGH

A tribunal has normally always to respect the principle of judicial
propriety that an applicant before it has to be heard before its request is
rejected, unless of course the request is prima facie absurd or totally
inadmissible, which does not appear to be so in this case. Being a firm
believer in the salutary principle of giving a hearing to an applicant who
has particularly asked for it, 1have strongly felt the need to explain the
circumstances which have led me to vote in this case.

Links