Separate opinion of Judge Broms
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BROMS
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BROMS
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN
1have voted for the Order of the Court but would like to explain my
approach and reasoning with respect to the point of law whether a State
requesting interim measures must establish a prima facie case as to the
existence of the right sought to be preserved by the requested measures.
SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT ODA
DECLARATION OF JUDGE TARASSOV
1have voted for the present Order, albeit not without some hesitation.
Asitseemsto me,the continuation ofthe construction work on the East
Channel Bridgeover the Great Belteven now constitutes a serious threat
to the continued, unimpeded passage of international shipping through
this international strait. The present bridgeroject has been conceivedin
such a way that not only after its final realization, but even during the
construction process, it would impose serious physical limitations upon
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SCHWEBEL
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BEDJAOUI
To my regret, 1 was unable to vote in favour of the idea of giving a
hearing to the Republic of El Salvador.
As it had been shown to be impossible for the Court to proceed to a
separate examination, first of the question whether a hearing should be
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA
1. For purely procedural reasons, 1 did not support the request of El
Salvador for an oral hearing relating to its Declaration of Intervention at
this present stage. 1wish in this opinion to clarify those reasons and to
expressmy unease at what 1believetohavebeen unfortunate aspects of the
procedure followed by the Court in this case.
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGES RUDA, MOSLER, AGO,
SIR ROBERT JENNINGS AND DE LACHARRIÈRE
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE NAGENDRA SINGH
A tribunal has normally always to respect the principle of judicial
propriety that an applicant before it has to be heard before its request is
rejected, unless of course the request is prima facie absurd or totally
inadmissible, which does not appear to be so in this case. Being a firm
believer in the salutary principle of giving a hearing to an applicant who
has particularly asked for it, 1have strongly felt the need to explain the
circumstances which have led me to vote in this case.
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SHAHABUDDEEN