other_document

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO CESSATION OF
THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE ANDTO NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT

(Marshall Islandsnited Kingdom) (Preliminary Objections)

Reply ofthe Marshall Islands

to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end ofthe public sitting of
16 March 2016 at 3 p.m.

*

Question:

The Marshall Islands, in the course of thetensubmissions and oral

ro ·Page 1 of 3 2016-03-30 15 31'28 31205248246 From: Van Den Blesen Ktoostra Advocate

VANDENBIESEN KLOOSTRA ADVOCATEN

DEGROENEBOCHT

l

AMBASSADOR OF INDIA
THE HAGU~ (THE NETHERLANDS)

HAG/POL/443/3/2014

29 March, 2016

Excellency,

1 have the honour to fOI-wardthe Note received from the Agent of
the Govemment of lndia in the case regarding Obligations concerning
Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to
Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. ln dia)

~ 4~i~ ê1~ tl,
MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
NEW DELHI

23 March 2016

Excellency,

Reference the question posed by Judge CancadoTrindade at the conclusion
of oral hearings on 16 March 2016 in the case regarding Obligations concerning
Negotiations relating to Cessationof Nuclear ArmsRaceandto Nuclear Disarmament
(Marshall Islands v lndia).

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO
CESSATION OF THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE AND TO NUCLEAR
DISARMAMENT

(Marshall Islands v. India) (Jurisdiction)

. Reply of the Marsha11Islands
to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting of
16 March 2016 at 10 a.m.

*

Question:

REPUBLIC OF CHILE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs

May 12th, 2015

H.E. Mr Philippe Couvreur
Registrar
International Court of Justice
Peace Palace

The Hague
The Netherlands

Sir,

ObUgation to Negotiate Attess to the Patifit Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile)
Chile's Answer to Judge Owada'squestion concerning tite meaning of "sovereign access to the sea"

COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES ON IRAN'S REPLY TO THE

QUESTIONS PUT BY JUDGE R.IGAUXTO BOTH PARTIES

Premièrequestion: quel est le statut juridique de plates-formes pétrolièresaménagéespar
un Etat sur son plateau continental? Quelles sont les compétencesexercéessur ces installations?

Quelle est la différenceentre le statut des plates-formes pétrolièresselon qu'elles sont localisées
respectivement dans la mer territoriale d'un Etat ou en dehors de celle-ci?

Comments on lran's Reply:

ESTADOPLURINACIONALDEBOLIVIA

Embajada La Haya - Paises Bajos

Bolivia's Response to the Question of Judge Owada

Bolivia has the honour herewith to submit its response to the question of Judge Owada on

defining the meaning of the term "sovereign access to the sea" and determining the specifie

content of that term as used for determining its position on the jurisdiction of the Court.

With regard to the relevance of this question to the jurisdiction of the Court, Bolivia observes

372 NUCLEAR TESTS

the terms of Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, in the N~iclear Tests case

(Aitsrralia v. France). 1have the honour to sendyou herewith three copies of the
bilingual edition. printed by the Registry, of that Application.

74. THE REGISTRAR TO THE SECRETARY-GENER AFLTHE UNITEDNATIONS'

30 May 1973

- 2 -

[Translation]

Answer by the Republic of Guinea-Bissau to the question
put on 8 April 1991 by Judge Weeramantry

The question putto both Parties by Judge Weeramantry at the sitting

of 8 April 1991 was as follows:

"If the Tribunal had held that the Agreement of 1960 was
binding only in respect of the territorial sea, but not in