other_document

Title
Other documents

Comments of the Democratic Republic of the Congo on the replies given by the Republic of Uganda to the questions put by Members of the Court at the close of the first round of oral argument (translati

DEMOCRATie REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO

Comments on the replies given by Uganda to the questions put by Judges Vereshchetin,
Kooijmans and Elaraby during the oral proceedings in the case concerning
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo

(Democratie Republic of the Congo v. Uganda)

13 May 2005

Written answer of the United Kingdom to the question posed by Judge Hsu on 17 May 1952

ZI mai 1952.
Monsieur l'Agent,
Ala date du 17mai 1952. VOUS avez bien voulu déposerles conclusions
du Gouvernement hellenique en l'affaire Ambatielos.
Le texte signépar vous contient les mots suivants, à la fi11du premier
paragraphe :n ....et égalementles articles Iet 3 dutraitédu 16juillet!
1926 ...8. Je vous serais obligéde bien vouloir me faire connaître si
ces numéros d'articles sont bien exacts oii s'il ne convient pas plut6t
de lirecles articlesI et 4 du traité ».

Costa Rica's comments on Nicaragua's written response to the questions put to the Parties by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna at the end of the public sitting held on 12 March 2009

Case concerning Navigational and Related Rights

(Costa Rica v Nicaragua)

Costa Rica's comments on Nicaragua's response to the Questions asked bv
.TudgesKoroma, Keith and Bcnnouna

Costa Rica's comments on Nicaragua's responsc to the question asked by

Written response of Nicaragua to the questions put to the Parties by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna at the end of the public sitting held on 12 March 2009

Dispute regarding Navigational and Related Rights

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

NICARAGUA'S

ANSWERS TO JUDGES' QUESTIONS

(Put to the Parties at the close of the public sitting of this case on 12 March 2009
by Judges Koroma, Keith and Bennouna)

ANSWER TO QUESTION FROM JUDGE KOROMA

The question:

Can either Party provide evidence as to whether Costa Rican locals and immigrants used

Written response of Serbia to the question put to the Parties by Judge Abraham

Response to the Question raised by Judge Ab1 aham

On 28 May 2008, Judge Abraham posed the following question to both parties:

Les Parties se sont référées, entre autres, aux affaires rs la Licéité de l'emploi de la
force, dans lesquelles la Cour ajugé en 2004 qu'elle n'avait pas compétence pour connaître des
requêtes de la Serbie-et-Monténégro, au motif que cet Etat ne remplissait pas les conditions à lacès

Written reply of the Republic of Honduras to the question put by Judge ad hoc Gaja at the public sitting held on 16 March 2007

QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE AD HOC GAJA

May Logwood Cay and Media Luna Cay be currently regarded as islands within the
meaning of Article 121, paragraph 1, ofthe UnitedNations Convention on the Law of the

Sea?

1. On 22"d March 2007 Counsel for Honduras provided a preliminary response in
answer to the question from Judge ad hoc Gaja, on the basis of the evidence that

Written answers of Libya to the questions posed by Judges Mosler, Oda and Schwebel

502 COSTtNEhTAL SHELF

128. THE AGENT OF THE LIBYAN ARAB JAXlAHIRII'A. TO THE REGI-RAR

1have the honour to enclose the response or Libya to the questions posed by
Judges Mosler, Oda and Schwcbcl.

Noting that Judge Mosler'squestion refers only to paragraph I of Article 76
of the draR convention. the Libyan Jamahiriya regard the first par{ of this
paragraph as representing existing. customary law. This is for the reason that.

Subscribe to other_document
Links