other_document

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

OBLIGATIONS CONCERNING NEGOTIATIONS RELATING TO
CESSATION OF THE NUCLEAR ARMS RACE AND TO NUCLEAR
DISARMAMENT

(Marshall Islands v. India) (Jurisdiction)

. Reply of the Marsha11Islands
to the question put by Judge Cançado Trindade at the end of the public sitting of
16 March 2016 at 10 a.m.

*

Question:

REPUBLIC OF CHILE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs

May 12th, 2015

H.E. Mr Philippe Couvreur
Registrar
International Court of Justice
Peace Palace

The Hague
The Netherlands

Sir,

ObUgation to Negotiate Attess to the Patifit Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile)
Chile's Answer to Judge Owada'squestion concerning tite meaning of "sovereign access to the sea"

COMMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES ON IRAN'S REPLY TO THE

QUESTIONS PUT BY JUDGE R.IGAUXTO BOTH PARTIES

Premièrequestion: quel est le statut juridique de plates-formes pétrolièresaménagéespar
un Etat sur son plateau continental? Quelles sont les compétencesexercéessur ces installations?

Quelle est la différenceentre le statut des plates-formes pétrolièresselon qu'elles sont localisées
respectivement dans la mer territoriale d'un Etat ou en dehors de celle-ci?

Comments on lran's Reply:

ESTADOPLURINACIONALDEBOLIVIA

Embajada La Haya - Paises Bajos

Bolivia's Response to the Question of Judge Owada

Bolivia has the honour herewith to submit its response to the question of Judge Owada on

defining the meaning of the term "sovereign access to the sea" and determining the specifie

content of that term as used for determining its position on the jurisdiction of the Court.

With regard to the relevance of this question to the jurisdiction of the Court, Bolivia observes

372 NUCLEAR TESTS

the terms of Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, in the N~iclear Tests case

(Aitsrralia v. France). 1have the honour to sendyou herewith three copies of the
bilingual edition. printed by the Registry, of that Application.

74. THE REGISTRAR TO THE SECRETARY-GENER AFLTHE UNITEDNATIONS'

30 May 1973

- 2 -

[Translation]

Answer by the Republic of Guinea-Bissau to the question
put on 8 April 1991 by Judge Weeramantry

The question putto both Parties by Judge Weeramantry at the sitting

of 8 April 1991 was as follows:

"If the Tribunal had held that the Agreement of 1960 was
binding only in respect of the territorial sea, but not in

13 July 2000

QATAR'S RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE PARRA-ARANGUREN

TO QATAR AND BAHRAIN

At the hearing of 29 June 2000, Judge Parra-Aranguren addressed the following question to
both Parties:

"What is the extent and what are the territorial limits of Zubarah? An accurate
description would be appreciated, with indication of the evidence supporting the
answer".

Qatar'sresponse is as follows:

[Translation]

Reply by Senegal to the questions put on 12 February 1990
by Judge Oda

First Question

Under what internal law or acts of Senegal did the Senegalese Navy

board the fishing vessel Hoyo Maru No. 8 and take it to the port of

Dakar on 9 October 1989, and was the Captain of the vessel subjected to

judicial proceedings as a result of which he was ord.ered to pay a fine of

Reply of the Republic of Burundi to the questions posed by Judges Koroma,

Bennouna and Cançado Trindade at the close of the oral proceedings

[Translation]

The Republic of Burundi thanks the Court for allowing it once again to express its opinion
on certain aspects of the questions put to the C ourt by the General Assembly. The brief comments
which follow are intended to provide some elements of a reply to two of the three questions posed

by the Court.

Question 1 [question posed by Judge Koroma]:

Annex to LUK92/18

Replies by Libya to the questions put by Judge SChwebel

Libya understands that the thrust of the three questions put by
Judge Schwebel is to obtain the views of the Parties on the question
whether the Montreal Convention (various Articles thereof, particularly
10 and 12) applies when the "persan" who has committed the offence and is