Preliminary objections

USITED KISGDO.\I COUSTER->IEMORIAI. (4 II52)
130
I'nrizgrnph
they had bcen called as witnesses, the evidence of
Major Laing or Sir Joseph hlaclay would have
~xoved the existence of such an oral agreement jj-63
The decision of Mr. Justice Hill in the Admiralty
Court and that of the Court of Appeal were hoth
just and in accordance aith the rules of Englisli
law and practice ; in these proceedings the Clai-

This volume shoilld be quotedas:

"1.C.J.Plgadings, Case concerninRight o/ Passage over
I.ird.ia>erritory (Portugal v. India),l. II."

Le prèsent volume doit êtrecité comme suit.:
tC. 1J. MLw~oires,Aflxire dudroitde passage szsr

tewifoivig$dz'(Portugal c.Ifide)vol. II.1)

Saiesmumber 248 1
No de vente: INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS

CASE CONCERNING

3. OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT
OF ISRAEL ON THE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONSOF THE

GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLICOFBULGARIA *

Introduction