Reply of the Kingdom of Cambodia to the question put to the Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade (translation)

- 2 -

Letter to the Registrar dated 6 June 2011 from

the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find below the replies of Cambodia to the questions put by Judge Cançado Trindade
at the end of the sitting of 31 May.

Cambodia has understood the questions as pertaining to the population displacements, firstly,

Comments of the Kingdom of Cambodia on the written reply of Thailand to the question put by Judge Yusuf at the end of the public sitting held on Wednesday 17 April 2013 at 3 p.m.

Letter to the Registrar dated 3 May 2013

from the Agent of Cambodia

[Translation]

Please find enclosed, in both French and English, the comments of Cambodia on Thailand’s
reply to the question put by Judge Yusuf, together with an accompanying map.

___________

Reply of the Kingdom of Thailand to the question put to the Parties by Judge Cançado Trindade

Question: In the present request for the indication of provisional measures by the
Court, it is stated, inter alia, that, as a result of the incidents occurred since 22 April
2011 in "the area of the Temple ofPreah Vihear", as weil as at other places along the

boundary between the two contending States, "fatalities, injuries and the
displacement of local inhabit~ n trs"aused.

What further information can be provided by the Parties to the Court about

Written replies of Nicaragua to the questions put to it by Judges Simma, Bennouna and Greenwood

Reply of the Republic ofNicaragua to the questions put by Judges Simma, Bennouna

and Greenwood at the end ofhearing on provisional measures requested by Costa Rica

in the case concerning Certain Activities carried out by Nicaragua in the Border Area

(Costa Rica v. Nicaragua)

Judge SIMMA:

1. Before the hearing of 11 January 2011, did Nicaragua ever make, or attempt to

Document submitted to the Court - Agreement between Australia and the Republic of Nauru for the Settlement of the Case

COUK INTERNATIONALEDE JUSTICE

MEMOIRE SLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS

AFFAIRE DE CERTAINESTERRES
A PHOSPHATESÀ NAURU

(NAURU c.AUSTRALIE)

VOLUME III
Contre-mémoirede l'Australie; procédureorale;
réponsesaux questionsosrespoilda;docurnenr

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS

CASE CONCERNING
CERTAIN PHOSPHATE LANDS IN NAURU

(NAURU vAUSTRALIA)

Written comments of Belgium on the replies or supplementary replies of Senegal to the questions put by Members of the Court at the close of the hearing held on 16 March 2012 (translation)

INTERNATIONAL C OURT OF J USTICE

Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite
(Belgium v. Senegal)

Comments of the Kingdom of Belgium on the replies given by the
Republic of Senegal to the questions put by certain judges

I. Comments on the replies given by Senegal to the question put by Judge Greenwood

Subscribe to
Links