DECLARATION OF JUDGE CRAWFORD
Plausibility of claimed rights under CERD  Banning of Mejlis  Role of Mejlis in light of modern history of the Crimean Tatars  Meaning of racial discrimination

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE BHANDARI

A. Introduction

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE C ANÇADO T RINDADE

Table of Contents

Paragraphs
I. Prolegomena ...........................................................................1.....................................

II. Conceptual Development of Provisional Measures of Protection ..........................3.....

D ECLARATION OF J UDGE T OMKA

Order on provisional measures  Scope of the first measure ordered  Insufficient
attention paid to reasons underlying decisions of the Supreme Court of Crimea and the Supreme

Court of the Russian Federation  Lack of urgency.

SEPARATE OPINION OF J UDGE O WADA

1. I have voted in favour of the Order in support of all points contained in its operative
paragraph 106. I also agree with the Court’s decision not to grant Ukraine’s request for provisional
measures concerning the International Conven tion for the Suppression of the Financing of

Annex 1
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPLICATION FOR REVISION
OF THE JUDGMENT OF 23 MAY 2008
IN THE CASE CONCERNING
SOVEREIGNTY OVER PEDRA BRANCAJPULA U BA TU PUTEH,
M/DDLEROCKSANDSOUTHLEDGE
(MALA YSIAI SINGAPORE)
(MALAYSIA v. SINGAPORE)
Colony of Singapore Confidential Telegram No 52 from Govemor of
Singapore to Secretary of State for the Colonies dated 7 February 1958
regarding Tenitorial Waters.
I
\
'\
·I I
FROM
RUTD. TO