Dissenting opinion of Judge Robinson
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ROBINSON
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE ROBINSON
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE BHANDARI
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE
DECLARATION OF JUDGE GAJA
Assignment of a building for the use as premises of a diplomatic mission ⎯
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations ⎯ Absence of a requirement that the receiving State
gives its consent ⎯ Application of laws and regulations of the receiving State ⎯ Positions taken by
certain receiving States with regard to the location of premises of missions ⎯ Alleged abuse of rights
by the sending State ⎯ Compliance by the receiving State with its obligations under the Convention.
DISSENTING OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT XUE
1. Regrettably, I disagree with the decision rendered by the Court in this case. As a judicial
duty, I shall explain the reasons for my position.
1. The issue involved in the present case
SEPARATE OPINION OF PRESIDENT YUSUF
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE
SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CANÇADO TRINDADE
IN THE NAME OF GOD
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE 1955 TREATY OF AMITY,
ECONOMIC RELATIONS, AND CONSULAR RIGHTS
(ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)
ANNEXES TO THE OBSERVATIONS AND SUBMISSIONS
ON THE U.S. PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
SUBMITTED BY THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
23 December 2019