Memorandum of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on the
Application filed before the International Court of Justice by the
Cooperative of Guyana on March 29
, 2018

th
ANNEX

Table of Contents

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING
ARBITRAL AWARD OF 3 OCTOBER 1899

CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA
v.
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA

MEMORIAL OF GUYANA

VOLUME IV

19 NOVEMBER 2018

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING
ARBITRAL AWARD OF 3 OCTOBER 1899

CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA
v.
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA

MEMORIAL OF GUYANA

VOLUME III

19 NOVEMBER 2018

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

CASE CONCERNING
ARBITRAL AWARD OF 3 OCTOBER 1899

CO-OPERATIVE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA
v.
BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA

MEMORIAL OF GUYANA

VOLUME II

19 NOVEMBER 2018

Note: This translation has been prepared by the Registry for internal purposes and has no official
character
15620
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
IMMUNITIES AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
(EQUATORIAL GUINEA v. FRANCE)
COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC
ANNEXES
6 December 2018
[Translation by the Registry]
LIST OF ANNEXES
Annex 1 Note Verbale No. 3227 from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the French Republic to
the Embassy of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea, 28 June 2002

- 53 -
ANNEX 1
Paris Tribunal de grande instance, 32nd Chambre correctionnelle, judgment of 27 October 2017 (extracts)
- 54 -
Judgment of the Paris Tribunal correctionnel dated 27 October 2017
[Translation]
[Pages 1 and 2 of French original]
CRIMINAL JUDGMENT
At the public sitting of the Paris Tribunal correctionnel on the NINETEENTH, TWENTIETH, TWENTY-FIRST, TWENTY-SECOND, TWENTY-SIXTH, TWENTY-EIGHTH and TWENTY-NINTH of JUNE, and the FIFTH and SIXTH of JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND SEVENTEEN, the following case was heard:
BETWEEN:

DECLARATION OF JUDGE AD HOC KRESS
Standard of plausibility  Genocidal intent  Protected group under the Genocide Convention.
1. I have voted in favour of all points contained in operative paragraph 86 of the Order. I also concur with the essence of the Court’s reasoning. I only wish to add a few observations regarding the plausibility standard, and, in particular, regarding its connection with the questions of genocidal intent and protected groups under the Genocide Convention.

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE CANÇADO TRINDADE
Table of Contents
Paragraph
I. Prolegomena: Some Introductory Considerations in Historical Perspective. ................. 1
II. Provisional Measures of Protection in ICJ Case under the Convention against
Genocide. ......................................................................................................................... 7
1. Provisional Measures in the First Case on the Application of the

SEPARATE OPINION OF VICE-PRESIDENT XUE
1. I voted in favour of the operative paragraph of the Order, however, with reservations to some of the reasoning. Given the importance of the issues involved, even at the present stage of the proceedings, I feel obliged to put on record my separate opinion.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
APPEAL RELATING TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE ICAO
COUNCIL UNDER ARTICLE II, SECTION 2, OF THE 1944
INTERNATIONAL AIR SERVICES TRANSIT AGREEMENT
THE KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN,
THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT,
AND THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
v.
THE STATE OF QATAR
REJOINDER OF THE STATE OF QATAR
VOLUME II
29 JULY 2019