INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
JURISDICTIONAL IMMUNITIES OF THE STATE
(GERMANYV.ITALY)
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
OF
THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
REGARDING ITALY'S COUNTER-CLAIM
10MARCH 2010 1
Outline of Argument
1. Subject-Matter of the Counter-Claim (section 1)
II. Legal Basis of Preliminary Objections (sections 2-3)
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
MARITIME DISPUTE
(PERU v. CHILE)
REJOINDER OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF CHILE
VOLUME I
11 JULY 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
GLOSSARY OF PRINCIPAL DEFINED TERMS, ABBREVIATIONS
AND ACRONYMS ix
LIST OF FIGURES IN VOLUME I xiii
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
CASE CONCERNING
AERIAL HERBICIDE SPRAYING
ECUADOR
V.
COLOMBIA
MEMORIAL OF ECUADOR
VOLUME I
28 APRIL 2009VOLUME I TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW OF THE CASE..................1
ATTORNEY-GENERAL
CANBERRA
International Court of Justice
Timor-Lestev. Australia
Written undertaldug by Senator the Hon George Brandis QC,
Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia
WHEREAS
GOVERNO
REPUBLICA DEMOCRÂTICA DE TIMOR-LESTE
9 January2014
H.E. Mr Philippe Couvreur
Registrar of the International Court of Justice
International Court of Justice
Peace Palace
Carnegieplein 2
2517 KJ The Hague
Sir,
In advance of the oral proceedings due to open on 20 January 2014, I enclose a set of
documents to which the Democratie Republic of Timor-Leste and its Counsel intend to refer.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
WRALING IN THE ANTARCTIC
(AUSTRAL/A v.JAPAN: NEW ZEALAND INTERVENING)
Response to
"Scientific review of issues raised by the Memorial of
Australia including its two Appendices" by
Professer Lars Wal10e [9 Apri12013]
MarcMangel
University of California
Santa Cruz
·31 May 20131. INTRODUCTION
Sdentific review of issuesraised by thMemorr ifa~
A.ustrraliainduding its two Appendices
U..as all,;e
April 9, 2013
1About the Author
lars Wall!l}eis currently Professor Emeritus of Physiology at the University of Oslo. Hetook
.10 June 2013
Dear Sir,
With reference to the case conceming Whaling in the Antarctic
(Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening), I have the honour to
acknowledge receipt ofyour letter No. 141981 dated 5 June 2013,
under caver ofwhich you transmitted a copy of the letter from Australia
submitting its observations with regard to my letter dated 31 May whereby
two notes prepared by Professor Judy Zeh ofthe University of Washington
were transmitted.
17 June20l3
DearSfr~
Wilhtef~t~ tthe:case.çop;cgrhalimc.iii ilie.Antarctic.
(Australia"v. NewZeaia:nd intervehavetnedïonou· ·
aèJqic;Jwl~dg~·r.eèë .1:fO9·ddf1di\flet,tirqer9
cov~ofwlïichyotra:ns.m.copy·oftl~t temthe'·Ageni·.of
Awtralia.eott:nnühisGov.enin ibsrt~,dnn·çoilnëction
"v.lry.·:....... .. .. ... · ···· ···
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
WHALING IN THE ANTARCTIC
(AUSTRAL/A v.JAPAN)
STATEMENT BY DR NICK GALES BVMS PhD
Chief Scientist, Australian Antarctic Program
15 APRIL 2013
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. fu this statement I draw on my direct experience as: an active member of the