written_pleading

Title
Written proceedings

Counter-Memorial of Australia

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

_____________________________________________

QUESTIONS RELATING TO THE SEIZURE AND DETENTION OF

CERTAIN DOCUMENTS AND DATA

(TIMOR-LESTE v. AUSTRALIA)

COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF AUSTRALIA

VOLUME I

COUNTER-MEMORIAL

ANNEXES 1 - 28

28 JULY 2014 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
_____________________________________________

Memorial of Nicaragua

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

DISPUTE CONCERNING

CONSTRUCTION OF AROAD INC OSTARICA

ALONG THESAN JUANR IVER

(NICARAGUA V .OSTA RICA)

M EMORIAL

OF THEREPUBLIC NICARAGUA

V OLUMEI

19 December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1. . . . . . . . . . .

A. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT ............................ 1

Rejoinder of Costa Rica

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

DISPUTE CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD IN

COSTA RICA ALONG THE SAN JUAN RIVER

NICARAGUA v. COSTA RICA

REJOINDER OF COSTA RICA

VOLUME I

2 FEBRUARY 2015 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

DISPUTE CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD IN

COSTA RICA ALONG THE SAN JUAN RIVER

NICARAGUA v. COSTA RICA

REJOINDER OF COSTA RICA

VOLUME I

Written observations of Nicaragua and Request by Nicaragua for the modification of the Order in light of the joinder of the proceedings in the two cases

EMBASSY OF NICARAGUA

THE HAGUE

WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS ON THE REQUEST BY COSTA RICA FOR THE

MODIFICATION OF THE COURT'S ORDER OF 8 MARCH 2011 IN THE

CASE CONCERNING CERTAIN ACTIVITIES CARRIED OUT BY NICARAGUA

IN THE BORDER AREA (COSTA RICA v. NICARAGUA)

I. INTRODUCTION

1. On 21 May 2013, Costa Rica filed a Request for the Modification of the Court's Order of 8

March 2011 on Provisional Measures in the case conceming Certain Activities carried out by

Extract of letters dated 21 June 2013 from the Registrar to the Agents of the Parties

Extract of letters dated 21 June 2013 from the Registrar to the Agents of the Parties

“…I have the honour to inform you that the Court has decided that the material prepared

by Professor Zeh and attached to the letter from the Agent of Japan dated 31 May 2013
will not be treated as expert evidence but rather as any other observations of the
Government of Japan.”

_________________

Links