Intervention

Code
25

Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) - The Federal Republic of Germany files a declaration of interven

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2022/31
5 September 2022
Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) The Federal Republic of Germany files a declaration of intervention in the proceedings under Article 63 of the Statute

Written response of Nicaragua to the question put to it by Judge Donoghue at the end of the hearing held on 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA

TERRITORIALANDMARITIMEDISPUTE

(NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA)

PROCEEDINGS ON WHETHER TO GRANT COSTA RICA'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO
INTERVENE

The Hague, 22 October 2010

ANSWER TO JUDGE DONOGHUE'S QUESTION

Question : Nicaragua bas made written and oral sùbmissions to the Court regarding

Costa Rica's comments on Nicaragua's written response to the question put by Judge Donoghue at the public sitting held on Friday 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

141001
10/29/10 FRI 09:05 FAX 5712574754 EMBAJADA DE COSTARICA

EMBAJADADE COSTARICA
Bogotà, D.C,- Colombla

28 0 tober 2010
ECR OL No. 10.,189

Excellency,

TerritorialandMaritimeDispute(Nicaragua/Colombia)

Nicaragua's comments on Costa Rica's written response to the question put by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on Friday 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

A NNEX TO N ICARAGUA S COMMENTS ON THE RESPONSE OF THE C OSTA R ICAN
G OVERNMENT TO THE QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE B ENNOUNA

Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia)

Application for permission to intervene filed by the Republic of Costa Rica

[Translation by the Registry]

1. At the end of the public hearing held on Friday 15October2010, JudgeBennouna
addressed the following question to Costa Rica:

Written response of Costa Rica to the question put to it by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

TERRITORIAL ANDMARITIME DISPUTE

NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA

APPLICATION BY COSTA RICA FOR PERMISSION TO lNTERVENE

COSTA RICA'S ANSWER TO THE HONOURABLE JUDGE BENNOUNA'S QUESTION

1. At the conclusion of the oral pleadings on Costa Rica's application for permission

to intervene in the case concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua/

Colombia), Judge Bennouna posed to Costa Ricathe following question:

Written Observations of Japan on the written observations submitted by New Zealand

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE

WHALING IN THE ANTARCTIC

(AUSTRALIA v. JAPAN: NEW ZEALAND INTERVENING)

WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS OF JAPAN

ON

NEW ZEALAND'S WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS

31 MAY 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. PRELIMINARYMATTERS ................................................. l

A. Issues regarding intervention of a third State under Article

Written Observations of Colombia

EMBAJADD AECOLOMBIA
LaHaya-LosPaisesBajos

Ubertodrden
The Hague, 26 May 2010

Dear Sir,

I refer to your letter dated 25 February 2010 informing that the Court has fixed
26 May 2010 as the time-limit for the filing ofwritten observations by the Parties in
the case concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia) with

regard to Costa Rica's Application for permission to intervene.

Subscribe to Intervention
Links