Intervention

Code
25

Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) - The Kingdom of Sweden files a declaration of intervention in th

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2022/34
9 September 2022
Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) The Kingdom of Sweden files a declaration of intervention in the proceedings under Article 63 of the Statute

Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) - The United States of America files a declaration of interventio

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2022/33
8 September 2022
Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) The United States of America files a declaration of intervention in the proceedings under Article 63 of the Statute

Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) - The Federal Republic of Germany files a declaration of interven

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2022/31
5 September 2022
Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation) The Federal Republic of Germany files a declaration of intervention in the proceedings under Article 63 of the Statute

Written response of Nicaragua to the question put to it by Judge Donoghue at the end of the hearing held on 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA

TERRITORIALANDMARITIMEDISPUTE

(NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA)

PROCEEDINGS ON WHETHER TO GRANT COSTA RICA'S APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO
INTERVENE

The Hague, 22 October 2010

ANSWER TO JUDGE DONOGHUE'S QUESTION

Question : Nicaragua bas made written and oral sùbmissions to the Court regarding

Nicaragua's comments on Costa Rica's written response to the question put by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on Friday 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

A NNEX TO N ICARAGUA S COMMENTS ON THE RESPONSE OF THE C OSTA R ICAN
G OVERNMENT TO THE QUESTION PUT BY JUDGE B ENNOUNA

Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia)

Application for permission to intervene filed by the Republic of Costa Rica

[Translation by the Registry]

1. At the end of the public hearing held on Friday 15October2010, JudgeBennouna
addressed the following question to Costa Rica:

Written response of Costa Rica to the question put to it by Judge Bennouna at the end of the hearing held on 15 October 2010, at 5 p.m.

TERRITORIAL ANDMARITIME DISPUTE

NICARAGUA V. COLOMBIA

APPLICATION BY COSTA RICA FOR PERMISSION TO lNTERVENE

COSTA RICA'S ANSWER TO THE HONOURABLE JUDGE BENNOUNA'S QUESTION

1. At the conclusion of the oral pleadings on Costa Rica's application for permission

to intervene in the case concerning the Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua/

Colombia), Judge Bennouna posed to Costa Ricathe following question:

Links