SEPARATE OPINION OFJUDGE SETTE-CAMARA

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE EL-ERIAN

1concurin the Opinion of the Court. 1amin agreement with the analysis
of the facts of thecase,the statement of the applicableprinciples of law and
the precise and clear replies furnished by the Opinion.1am moved to write
a separate opinion, first to elaborate on a few preliminary questions, and
second to relate some of the points raised in the Opinion to the general law
of international organizations.

SEPAIWTE OPINION OF JUDGE AG0

1.1subscribe to the Court's conclusions so far as the reply to be given to
the request for advisory opinion isconcerned. Those conclusions define the
mutual obligations iricumbent on the organization and host State in the
present case, in termis which largely correspond to what 1 myself have

found, though on tht: basis of grounds and reasoning which in part are
different.

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ODA

1concur with the Advisory Opinion of the Court in considering that the
transfer of theRegional Office from Alexandria to the new site, if such
transfer is inevitable, should be effected in an orderly manner with the
minimum of prejudice to the work of the Organization and the interest of
Egypt. However, differing as 1 do from the Advisory Opinion on some of
the legal issueshch it touches upon, 1feelbound to makeknown myown
individual views, as follows.

SEPAR4TE OPINION OF JUDGE MOSLER

1. 1subscribe to thr:operative provisions of the Opinion,as well as to the

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE RUDA

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE LACHS

The Court, having analysed the different views on the subject, turns
away from the Agreement between the World Health Organization and
Egypt of 25 March 1951 and the applicability of a specific provision
(Section 37),or rather part ofit,in theevent of the WHO or Egypt wishing
to have the Regional Office now situated at Alexandria transferred from

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE GROS

Having begun my study of the questions put to the Court by an ex-
amination of the cornipetence of the World Health Assembly, it seems to
me to be useful to outline the considerations, additional to - and some-
times more far-reach.ing than - the reasoning in the Advisory Opinion,

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GROS
[Translation]

DISSENTING OPINION OF
JUDGE SIR GERALD FITZMAURICE

[A summary of main conclusions
is given in paragraph 10 of this Opinion; and a synoptical table
of contents appears at the end, after the Annex.]

1. The real issues in thecase